Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Employee Satisfaction Survey Analysis
Analyzing relationships between workplace factors in a 100-person survey. Demonstrates standard correlation workflow: matrix calculation, heatmap generation, and actionable HR insights about salary, work hours, satisfaction, and productivity relationships.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Create sample employee satisfaction data (100 rows: salary, hours_worked, satisfaction, productivity) as CSV, analyze correlations
Output
What the skill generates for you
CORRELATION MATRIX ANALYSIS
===========================
Dataset shape: (97, 4)
Variables: ['salary', 'hours_worked', 'satisfaction', 'productivity']
Sample size: 97 observations
Missing values: 0
✓ Heatmap saved: correlation_heatmap.png
✓ Results saved: correlation_results.csv
MULTICOLLINEARITY ALERTS (|r| > 0.8):
🚨 satisfaction ↔ productivity: r = 0.998
🚨 hours_worked ↔ productivity: r = -0.996
🚨 hours_worked ↔ satisfaction: r = -0.995
🚨 salary ↔ hours_worked: r = -0.977
🚨 salary ↔ satisfaction: r = 0.976
🚨 salary ↔ productivity: r = 0.975
TOP CORRELATIONS (Ranked by strength):
======================================================================
satisfaction ↔ productivity
r = 0.998 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG POSITIVE
hours_worked ↔ productivity
r = -0.996 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG NEGATIVE
hours_worked ↔ satisfaction
r = -0.995 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG NEGATIVE
salary ↔ hours_worked
r = -0.977 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG NEGATIVE
salary ↔ satisfaction
r = 0.976 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG POSITIVE
salary ↔ productivity
r = 0.975 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG POSITIVE
======================================================================
KEY INSIGHTS:
======================================================================
1. SALARY EFFECTS:
• Salary ↔ Satisfaction: r = 0.976
→ Strong positive relationship
• Salary ↔ Productivity: r = 0.975
→ Strong positive relationship
2. WORKLOAD EFFECTS:
• Hours Worked ↔ Satisfaction: r = -0.995
→ Strong negative relationship
• Hours Worked ↔ Productivity: r = -0.996
→ Strong negative relationship
3. SATISFACTION-PRODUCTIVITY LINK:
• Satisfaction ↔ Productivity: r = 0.998
→ Strong positive relationship
→ This suggests satisfied employees are more productive
4. SAMPLE SIZE INTERPRETATION:
• With n = 97 observations (good sample size)
• Correlations |r| > 0.2 are typically reliable
• All major relationships show statistical significance
======================================================================
RECOMMENDATIONS:
======================================================================
✓ COMPENSATION STRATEGY:
Higher salaries strongly associated with satisfaction.
Consider competitive salary adjustments for retention.
✓ WORK-LIFE BALANCE:
Long hours negatively impact satisfaction.
Implement policies to reduce excessive overtime.
✓ EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT:
Strong satisfaction-productivity correlation detected.
Investing in employee satisfaction may boost productivity.
✓ EFFICIENCY FOCUS:
More hours ≠ more productivity.
Focus on work efficiency rather than time spent.
======================================================================
FILES GENERATED:
======================================================================
• correlation_heatmap.png - Visual correlation matrix
• correlation_results.csv - Complete correlation table
======================================================================
⚠️ IMPORTANT REMINDER
======================================================================
Correlation does not imply causation. These relationships may reflect
confounders or reverse causation. Further analysis (e.g., controlled
experiments, regression analysis) needed to establish causal relationships.
About This Skill
Calculate correlation matrices, generate heatmap visualizations, detect multicollinearity, and identify significant variable relationships in datasets for exploratory analysis and pre-modeling checks.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Housing Data Multicollinearity Check
Pre-regression multicollinearity analysis for a 200-home dataset. Shows detection of problematic correlations between beds/baths, provides specific variable exclusion recommendations, and identifies sqft as the strongest price predictor for feature selection.
Marketing Metrics with Derived Variables
Demonstrates proper handling of derived metrics (CTR = clicks/impressions) in correlation analysis. Separates mathematical artifacts from empirical findings, warns against misreporting formula-guaranteed relationships, and provides modeling recommendations for campaign data.