All examples for Correlation Matrix Explorer

Employee Satisfaction Survey Analysis

Analyzing relationships between workplace factors in a 100-person survey. Demonstrates standard correlation workflow: matrix calculation, heatmap generation, and actionable HR insights about salary, work hours, satisfaction, and productivity relationships.

Input

What you provide to the skill

Create sample employee satisfaction data (100 rows: salary, hours_worked, satisfaction, productivity) as CSV, analyze correlations

Output

What the skill generates for you

CORRELATION MATRIX ANALYSIS
===========================
Dataset shape: (97, 4)
Variables: ['salary', 'hours_worked', 'satisfaction', 'productivity']
Sample size: 97 observations
Missing values: 0
✓ Heatmap saved: correlation_heatmap.png
✓ Results saved: correlation_results.csv
MULTICOLLINEARITY ALERTS (|r| > 0.8):
🚨 satisfaction ↔ productivity: r = 0.998
🚨 hours_worked ↔ productivity: r = -0.996
🚨 hours_worked ↔ satisfaction: r = -0.995
🚨 salary ↔ hours_worked: r = -0.977
🚨 salary ↔ satisfaction: r = 0.976
🚨 salary ↔ productivity: r = 0.975
TOP CORRELATIONS (Ranked by strength):
======================================================================
satisfaction ↔ productivity
r = 0.998 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG POSITIVE
hours_worked ↔ productivity
r = -0.996 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG NEGATIVE
hours_worked ↔ satisfaction
r = -0.995 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG NEGATIVE
salary ↔ hours_worked
r = -0.977 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG NEGATIVE
salary ↔ satisfaction
r = 0.976 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG POSITIVE
salary ↔ productivity
r = 0.975 (p = 0.0000) ***
STRONG POSITIVE
======================================================================
KEY INSIGHTS:
======================================================================
1. SALARY EFFECTS:
• Salary ↔ Satisfaction: r = 0.976
→ Strong positive relationship
• Salary ↔ Productivity: r = 0.975
→ Strong positive relationship
2. WORKLOAD EFFECTS:
• Hours Worked ↔ Satisfaction: r = -0.995
→ Strong negative relationship
• Hours Worked ↔ Productivity: r = -0.996
→ Strong negative relationship
3. SATISFACTION-PRODUCTIVITY LINK:
• Satisfaction ↔ Productivity: r = 0.998
→ Strong positive relationship
→ This suggests satisfied employees are more productive
4. SAMPLE SIZE INTERPRETATION:
• With n = 97 observations (good sample size)
• Correlations |r| > 0.2 are typically reliable
• All major relationships show statistical significance
======================================================================
RECOMMENDATIONS:
======================================================================
✓ COMPENSATION STRATEGY:
Higher salaries strongly associated with satisfaction.
Consider competitive salary adjustments for retention.
✓ WORK-LIFE BALANCE:
Long hours negatively impact satisfaction.
Implement policies to reduce excessive overtime.
✓ EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT:
Strong satisfaction-productivity correlation detected.
Investing in employee satisfaction may boost productivity.
✓ EFFICIENCY FOCUS:
More hours ≠ more productivity.
Focus on work efficiency rather than time spent.
======================================================================
FILES GENERATED:
======================================================================
• correlation_heatmap.png - Visual correlation matrix
• correlation_results.csv - Complete correlation table
======================================================================
⚠️ IMPORTANT REMINDER
======================================================================
Correlation does not imply causation. These relationships may reflect
confounders or reverse causation. Further analysis (e.g., controlled
experiments, regression analysis) needed to establish causal relationships.