NPS Driver Analysis Report

Post-Launch Survey Results

Total Responses: 150
Overall NPS: 47
Distribution: 47% Promoters, 23% Passives, 30% Detractors

RECOMMENDATION: PAUSE rollout and address power user concerns before continuing

Executive Summary

Mixed sentiment with clear cohort divide: New users enthusiastic (NPS 70), power users highly dissatisfied (NPS -18)
New users love simplified interface and onboarding, power users frustrated by removed advanced features
Detractor concentration among most valuable user segment presents revenue risk
Primary concern: Feature removal without migration path or communication
Primary strength: Onboarding experience and performance improvements

Critical Finding: Power users represent 20% of survey respondents but typically drive 60-80% of revenue. Their -18 NPS represents existential risk.

Score Distribution

Promoters (9-10): 71 (47%)
Passives (7-8): 34 (23%)
Detractors (0-6): 45 (30%)

Detractor segment is disproportionately power users (73% of detractors vs 12% of overall user base). This concentration amplifies business impact.

Promoter Drivers

Simplified Interface & Onboarding

Prevalence: 58% | Score Impact: +0.5 | Cohort: 92% new users

“Finally an app that doesn’t require a manual. Onboarding was smooth and I was productive in 10 minutes.”

“Clean interface, no clutter. Everything I need right there.”

Action: Feature in marketing, create video case studies showcasing ease of use for acquisition campaigns.

Performance Improvements

Prevalence: 51% | Score Impact: +0.4 | Cohort: Mixed

“App loads 3x faster now. Searches that took 10 seconds are instant.”

“Responsiveness is night and day. This feels professional now.”

Action: Quantify performance gains in release notes, highlight in retention campaigns.

Mobile Experience

Prevalence: 43% | Score Impact: +0.3 | Cohort: 78% new users

“Mobile app finally works properly. Can do everything from my phone.”

“Mobile-first design shows. Better than competitors.”

Action: Amplify in App Store descriptions, target mobile-heavy segments.

Detractor Drivers

Removed Advanced Features - URGENT

Prevalence: 67% | Score Impact: -2.1 | Cohort: 89% power users

“You removed bulk actions I used 20 times per day. This breaks my entire workflow.”

“Advanced search filters gone. Years of saved queries useless. Considering [Competitor].”

“No announcement, no migration guide. Just deleted features paying customers relied on.”

Specific missing features mentioned:

Bulk edit/actions (22 mentions)
Advanced filter builder (18 mentions)
Custom field sorting (14 mentions)
Regex search (11 mentions)
API rate limit increases (9 mentions)

Churn risk: 11 detractors explicitly mentioned evaluating competitors or canceling. Estimated annual contract value: $180K-$240K based on power user ARPU.

Action: Emergency restoration of top 3 features (bulk edit, advanced filters, custom sorting) in hotfix release. Estimated impact: +15-18 NPS points, churn prevention.

Feature Discoverability

Prevalence: 44% | Score Impact: -1.2 | Cohort: 65% power users

“Everything moved. 30-minute learning curve just to find settings I access daily.”

“No migration guide, no ‘what changed’ documentation. Flying blind.”

Action: Create contextual “What’s New” guide, add feature discovery tooltips, publish migration documentation. Impact: +6-8 NPS points.

Communication Gap

Prevalence: 38% | Score Impact: -0.9 | Cohort: 71% power users

“Beta program ignored our feedback. Why ask if you won’t listen?”

“No warning about breaking changes. Woke up to a different product.”

“Feels like you optimized for new users and abandoned existing customers.”

Action: Immediate outreach to power users acknowledging concerns, publish transparent roadmap for feature restoration, establish power user advisory board. Impact: +4-5 NPS points (trust recovery).

Passive Drivers

Mixed Sentiment on Redesign

Prevalence: 52% | Conversion opportunity: 18-22 passives

“Looks better but I’m less productive now. Need time to adjust.”

“Performance is great but missing features I need.”

Action: Feature restoration will likely convert majority of passives to promoters. Estimated impact: +9-11 NPS points.

Documentation Gaps

Prevalence: 41% | Conversion opportunity: 12-16 passives

“Good changes overall but no guide on where things moved.”

Action: Comprehensive “What’s New” guide with before/after feature mapping. Impact: +5-6 NPS points.

Cohort Analysis

Cohort	Count	NPS	% of Revenue*	Risk Level
New Users (<30 days)	68	+70	8%	LOW
Regular Users	52	+28	32%	MEDIUM
Power Users	30	-18	60%	CRITICAL

*Estimated based on typical SaaS power user patterns

Critical Insight: Revenue concentration among detractors creates immediate business risk. Power users generate 60% of revenue but represent 67% of detractors.

Rollout Decision Framework

PAUSE Recommendation - Supporting Evidence

Revenue Risk: 73% of detractors are power users representing ~60% of revenue
Churn Signals: 11 users mentioned competitor evaluation (7.3% of total respondents)
Fixable Issues: Top 3 complaints are feature restorations (estimated 2-3 week fix)
Positive Foundation: 70 NPS from new users validates product direction
Quick Win Opportunity: Addressing top issues could shift NPS from 47 to 65+

Before Resuming Rollout

Phase 1: Emergency Response (Week 1-2)

Restore bulk edit functionality
Restore advanced filter builder
Restore custom field sorting
Publish feature restoration timeline
Direct outreach to 11 at-risk accounts

Phase 2: Experience Fixes (Week 2-3)

Create interactive “What’s New” tutorial
Publish migration guide (old feature → new location)
Add feature discovery tooltips
Enable legacy view toggle for power users (temporary)

Phase 3: Communication & Trust (Week 3-4)

Host power user AMA/feedback session
Establish power user advisory program
Publish transparent 90-day roadmap
Create tiered rollout plan (new users → regular → power)

Phase 4: Validation (Week 4-5)

Re-survey power user cohort (target: NPS 40+)
Monitor churn rate (target: <2%)
Track feature adoption in restored features
Verify detractor rate drops below 20%

Success Criteria Before Full Rollout

Overall NPS: 55+ (currently 47)
Power user NPS: 30+ (currently -18)
Detractor rate: <20% (currently 30%)
Zero active churn threats from power users
<10% “missing feature” complaint rate

Estimated NPS Impact by Action

Action	Estimated Impact	Timeline	Priority
Restore bulk edit	+8-10 points	1-2 weeks	URGENT
Restore advanced filters	+5-7 points	1-2 weeks	URGENT
Restore custom sorting	+2-4 points	1-2 weeks	HIGH
Migration documentation	+6-8 points	1 week	HIGH
What’s New tutorial	+4-5 points	1 week	HIGH
Power user outreach	+3-5 points	Ongoing	HIGH
Feature discovery UI	+3-4 points	2 weeks	MEDIUM

Combined potential impact: +31-43 NPS points, yielding projected NPS of 78-90 post-remediation.

Risk Assessment

Immediate Risks (If Rollout Continues)

Revenue: $180K-$240K ARR at immediate risk from stated churn intent
Reputation: Power users are influencers; negative word-of-mouth amplified 3-5x
Competitive: 11 users actively evaluating alternatives creates beachhead for competitors
Morale: Beta feedback ignored signals product team disconnect

Mitigation Benefits (If Paused)

Trust Recovery: Demonstrates customer-first approach, long-term loyalty building
Product Market Fit: Validates new user direction while preserving power user value
Reduced Churn: Feature restoration prevents immediate cancellations
Strategic Positioning: Creates differentiation vs competitors who abandoned power users

Confidence & Methodology

Method: Thematic analysis using TF-IDF vectorization and K-means clustering (k=4 per segment), sentiment correlation analysis
Sample Size: 150 responses (106 with detailed comments)
Confidence Level: High for power user segment (30 responses, clear themes), Medium for overall due to cohort imbalance
Limitations:
- Self-selected respondents may skew negative (unhappy users more likely to respond)
- 2-week post-launch may not capture long-term adaptation
- Revenue estimates based on industry benchmarks, not actual account data
- Causation inferred from correlation

Final Recommendation

PAUSE the rollout immediately.

The 70 NPS from new users validates product direction, but -18 NPS from revenue-driving power users creates existential risk. With focused effort over 3-4 weeks, you can:

Prevent $180K-$240K in immediate churn risk
Recover power user satisfaction (projected NPS shift: -18 → +40)
Maintain new user momentum (70 NPS foundation)
Position for sustainable 75+ NPS at scale

This is a fixable crisis, not a failed launch. The product direction is sound; execution on power user migration was inadequate. A 3-4 week pause to restore critical features and rebuild trust will yield stronger long-term outcomes than pushing forward and losing your most valuable customers.

Next Step: Convene immediate war room with product, engineering, and customer success to scope 2-week emergency sprint for top 3 feature restorations.

Post-Launch Rollout Decision Analysis

Input

Output