Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Placeholder PRD (Edge Case)
A TODO placeholder with scattered thoughts instead of structured PRD content. Shows how the validator handles edge cases by scoring 0/12 and providing a complete roadmap to build a proper PRD.
Input
What you provide to the skill
TODO
Fill this in later. Build something. Need search maybe? Questions: should we do voice search? When is this due?
Output
What the skill generates for you
PRD Completeness Analysis
Overall Score: 0/12 weighted (0%)
Breakdown: 0 complete, 0 weak, 12 missing
Status: INCOMPLETE - This is a placeholder, not a PRD
Complete Sections (0)
None. The document contains only a TODO note with scattered thoughts.
Missing Sections (12)
1. Problem Statement - MISSING
Issue: No clear problem definition exists
Impact: Team won’t understand what user pain this solves
Questions to Answer:
- What specific problem are users experiencing?
- What evidence supports this problem?
- What’s the cost of not solving this?
2. Target Users / Personas - MISSING
Issue: No user segments or personas defined
Impact: Can’t prioritize features, design won’t be targeted
3. Proposed Solution - MISSING
Issue: Only vague hints (“Build something. Need search maybe?”)
Impact: Engineering can’t estimate, stakeholders can’t evaluate
4. User Stories / Use Cases - MISSING
Issue: No acceptance criteria or user scenarios
Impact: Unclear what “done” looks like
5. Success Metrics - MISSING
Issue: No way to measure success
Impact: Can’t prove ROI or iterate based on data
6. Technical Requirements - MISSING
Issue: Only “Elasticsearch or what?” - no specs
Impact: Engineering can’t estimate or architect
7. Edge Cases & Error Handling - MISSING
Issue: No failure scenario consideration
Impact: Poor UX in error states
8. Dependencies - MISSING
Issue: No external blockers identified
Impact: Launch delays, unexpected blockers
9. Timeline / Milestones - MISSING
Issue: “When is this due?” is unresolved
Impact: Can’t plan resources
10. Risks & Mitigation - MISSING
Issue: No risk assessment
Impact: No contingency plans
11. Stakeholders - MISSING
Issue: No ownership defined
Impact: Unclear who decides open questions
12. Open Questions - MISSING
Issue: Questions embedded in TODO, not tracked
Impact: Decisions made implicitly
Recommendations
IMMEDIATE (Before This Can Be Called a PRD):
-
Answer Open Questions (1-2 hours)
- Voice search: In scope or out?
- Deadline: When is this due?
- Technology: What search engine?
-
Define Problem & Success Metrics (1 hour)
- What user pain does this solve?
- How will we measure success?
-
Draft Proposed Solution (1.5 hours)
- Core features vs. out of scope
- User flow and technology stack
BEFORE STAKEHOLDER REVIEW:
4. User Stories & Acceptance Criteria (1 hour)
5. Technical Requirements (1.5 hours)
6. Edge Cases & Error Handling (45 min)
7. Dependencies & Risks (1 hour)
8. Timeline & Stakeholders (45 min)
Estimated Total Time: 8-10 hours to transform to complete PRD
Benefit: Avoid 4-6 review rounds, prevent scope creep
Priority: CRITICAL - This is not yet a PRD
NEXT STEPS:
- Schedule 30-min session to answer open questions
- Block 2 hours to draft Problem, Solution, Success Metrics
- Share initial draft for feedback, then complete remaining sections
About This Skill
Validate PRD completeness against 12 essential sections, score gaps, and generate templates to fill them before stakeholder review.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Minimal PRD Missing Critical Sections
A bare-bones PRD with only Problem, Solution, and User Stories. Shows how the validator identifies 9 missing sections and provides prioritized templates to reach review-ready status.
Partial PRD with Weak Sections Identified
A more detailed PRD that covers 8 sections but has 2 weak areas (Stakeholders and Success Metrics lack specificity). Demonstrates the nuanced Complete/Weak/Missing scoring.