Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Launch Steering Committee Dashboard
Edge case with multiple launch-blocking risks requiring Red/Yellow/Green status for steering committee. Shows how to frame critical decisions, present options, and recommend specific actions with deadlines.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Beta NPS only 6/10 (target 8+), pricing not finalized, critical bug found by key customer, competitor launching in 6 weeks, team needs 2 more weeks. Launch steering committee Monday. Red/yellow/green status?
Output
What the skill generates for you
LAUNCH RISK DASHBOARD
🔴 RED (Launch Blocking)
Critical Bug from Key Customer
- High-value beta customer discovered critical issue - unresolved
- Cannot launch with unresolved critical bugs from reference accounts
OPTIONS:
A) Delay 2 weeks to fix (aligns with team timeline request)
B) Remove affected feature, add post-launch
C) Launch with known issue workaround (risk to reference relationship)
RECOMMENDATION: Option A - delay provides bug fix time and aligns with team capacity needs.
Pricing Not Finalized
- Blocks: purchase flow implementation, sales enablement, marketing assets, legal terms
- Sales/finance disagreement = no decisions executing
RECOMMENDATION: Force executive decision by Wednesday. CEO breaks tie, no further debate. Timeline: decide Wed, implement Thu-Fri, validate Monday morning.
🟡 YELLOW (At Risk)
Beta NPS 6/10 (Target 8+)
- Product-market fit concern
- Indicates weak word-of-mouth potential, churn risk post-launch
OPTIONS:
A) 4-week improvement sprint targeting top NPS detractors (pushes to Q4)
B) Launch to early adopter segment only, iterate based on production usage
C) Proceed with adjusted expectations, rapid iteration roadmap
NEED FROM COMMITTEE: Risk tolerance decision - accept lower initial NPS or delay for improvements?
Competitor Launching in 6 Weeks
- First-mover advantage window closing
- Creates market positioning pressure
MITIGATIONS: Competitive differentiation analysis underway, messaging adjusted.
QUESTION: Is beating competitor to market important enough to accept higher risk (lower NPS, unfinished pricing)?
🟢 GREEN (On Track)
Team Needs 2 More Weeks
- Actually aligns with bug fix requirement and pricing finalization needs
- Recommend approval - absorbs multiple risk mitigations
STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
STATUS SUMMARY:
- 🔴 RED: 2 items (critical bug, pricing)
- 🟡 YELLOW: 2 items (NPS, competitive timing)
- 🟢 GREEN: 1 item (team timeline)
IMMEDIATE ACTIONS:
- Approve 2-week extension (absorbs bug fix, pricing implementation)
- Force pricing decision by Wednesday (unblocks sales, marketing, engineering)
- NPS decision Thursday (launch with 6/10 or delay further for improvements?)
DECISIONS NEEDED MONDAY:
- Approve 2-week extension? (YES recommended)
- Commit to pricing decision deadline Wednesday? (YES required)
- NPS risk tolerance: launch at 6/10 or require improvement sprint?
RECOMMENDED REVISED TIMELINE:
- Monday: Steering committee approves extension
- Wednesday: Pricing finalized (executive decision)
- Week 1-2: Critical bug fix, pricing implementation
- End Week 2: Launch decision checkpoint (verify bug fixed, NPS reassessed)
About This Skill
Assess product risks and generate stakeholder communications before issues become crises. Prioritizes risks as HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW, drafts escalation messages, and recommends monitoring approaches.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Weekly Executive Update Triage
Realistic multi-risk scenario before Friday executive update. Demonstrates prioritization of revenue gaps, retention risks, vendor issues, and customer concerns with ready-to-send communications.
Basic Team Risk Triage
Simple baseline case with three common project risks (vendor delay, capacity, QA). Shows how the skill prioritizes by impact and provides appropriate communication guidance for each level.