Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Scope Guardian
Analyze feature requests against project scope and strategic goals to prevent scope creep.
What You Get
Get defensible scope decisions with stakeholder-ready communication templates, trade-off documentation, and alternative recommendations in minutes instead of hours.
The Problem
The Solution
How It Works
- 1 Capture project context including scope definition, strategic goals, timeline, and resource constraints
- 2 Document the feature request with source, description, rationale, urgency, and claimed impact
- 3 Analyze strategic alignment against primary goals, core value, success metrics, and timeline compatibility
- 4 Assess resource impact including effort estimate, required components, opportunity cost, and timeline risk
- 5 Generate scope decision with confidence level and clear rationale for each alignment criterion
- 6 Develop alternative recommendations including future phases, workarounds, and conditions for reconsideration
- 7 Draft stakeholder communication with acknowledgment, decision, rationale, alternatives, and invitation to discuss
- 8 Document trade-offs showing what's preserved by the decision and what's deferred
What You'll Need
- Project scope definition with core features for current release
- Strategic goals and success metrics
- Timeline and resource constraints
- Feature request details including requester role and stated rationale
Get This Skill
Requires Pro subscription ($9/month)
Have Feedback?
Help us improve this skill by sharing your ideas and suggestions.
Request ImprovementsExamples
Clear Out-of-Scope: Nice-to-Have Feature
A straightforward scope decision where a cosmetic feature request clearly doesn't align with a security-focused MVP. Demonstrates high-confidence decision-making with diplomatic communication.
Bundled Features: Strategic Unbundling
Complex scope analysis where a high-influence PM bundles two unrelated features. Demonstrates expert pattern recognition, strategic coaching, and phased alternative recommendations.
High-Stakes Escalation: Deal at Risk
Complex political scenario with CEO escalation and renewal risk. Demonstrates appropriate medium-confidence decision-making, information gathering before final call, and executive escalation path.