All examples for Stakeholder Priority Analyzer

Crisis Reprioritization with Multiple Urgent Items

Security vulnerability, marketing campaign launch, and CEO customer promise all converge with conflicting deadlines. Demonstrates crisis prioritization framework balancing existential risk (security), external commitments (CEO promise), and internal flexibility (marketing). Includes emergency response timeline, stakeholder communications for breaking commitments, and alternative solutions for each scenario.

Input

What you provide to the skill

Security team found vulnerability, needs fix this sprint. Marketing campaign launches next week needing their feature. CEO roadmap promise to customer due Friday. Team of 5.

Output

What the skill generates for you

PRIORITY ANALYSIS

Framework Applied

Impact/Effort/Strategic Alignment with Risk Assessment

Stakeholder Requests Summary

Request Stakeholder Effort Urgency
Security vulnerability fix Security Team Unknown (sprint-sized) This sprint
Marketing feature Marketing Unknown Next week (campaign launch)
CEO customer promise CEO Unknown Friday

Recommended Priority Ranking

🥇 PRIORITY 1: Security Vulnerability Fix - Immediate

Impact: CRITICAL

  • Security vulnerabilities represent existential risk to the business
  • Potential legal liability, compliance violations, data breaches
  • Reputational damage if exploited could dwarf all other concerns

Effort: Sprint-sized (team of 5)

Strategic Alignment: HIGHEST

  • Security is foundational—nothing else matters if the product is compromised
  • No feature launch or customer promise outweighs protecting user data

Risk of Delay: EXTREME

  • Vulnerabilities can be exploited at any moment
  • Regulatory penalties, breach notification requirements
  • Once exploited, damage is irreversible
  • Every day delayed increases exposure window

Rationale: This is non-negotiable. Security vulnerabilities don’t wait for convenient timing. A breach during the marketing campaign or while the CEO is presenting to the customer would be catastrophic. Fix this first, period.


🥈 PRIORITY 2: CEO Customer Promise - Due Friday

Impact: HIGH

  • Direct executive commitment to customer
  • CEO credibility and company reputation at stake
  • Likely tied to significant revenue or strategic relationship

Effort: Unknown (needs immediate sizing)

Strategic Alignment: HIGH

  • CEO-level commitments reflect company priorities
  • Customer relationships are long-term assets

Risk of Delay: HIGH - Hard external deadline

  • Friday is immovable
  • CEO credibility damaged if promise broken
  • Customer relationship potentially lost
  • No negotiating with external deadlines

Rationale: CEO commitments to customers carry significant weight. Unlike internal priorities that can be renegotiated, external promises have fixed deadlines and relationship consequences. Ranks second only because security is non-negotiable.


🥉 PRIORITY 3: Marketing Campaign Feature - Next Week

Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH

  • Campaign launch is scheduled, likely with external spend committed
  • Marketing effectiveness depends on feature availability
  • Revenue opportunity from campaign

Effort: Unknown (needs sizing)

Strategic Alignment: MEDIUM

  • Supports growth goals
  • But campaigns can be rescheduled more easily than security fixed

Risk of Delay: MEDIUM

  • Campaign timing is somewhat flexible
  • Marketing can potentially adjust messaging or delay launch
  • Internal deadline vs. external commitment

Rationale: Marketing campaigns, while important, are the most flexible of these three. Launch dates can shift, messaging can pivot, or features can be positioned as “coming soon” instead of “available now.” The campaign team has more options than the security team or the CEO.


Recommended Timeline (This Sprint)

Days 1-2: Security vulnerability fix (top 2-3 engineers)

  • All hands on security until resolved
  • Remaining team begins scoping CEO commitment

Days 3-4: CEO customer promise (full team if needed)

  • Security fix should be completed or near-complete
  • Shift focus to Friday deadline
  • Marketing feature scoping begins in parallel

Day 5 (Friday): Deliver CEO promise + marketing feature push begins

  • CEO commitment delivered
  • Begin marketing feature build

Days 6-7+: Marketing feature completion

  • Target: completion before campaign launch
  • If tight: negotiate launch delay or feature scope reduction

DRAFT STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

To Security Team

Subject: Security Fix - Top Priority, Starting Immediately

Security team,

Your vulnerability report is our top priority. We’re pulling the team to address this immediately.

What’s happening:

  • Starting remediation today
  • Dedicating top engineers to this until resolved
  • Other commitments are being delayed to make room

What we need from you:

  • Full details of the vulnerability and reproduction steps
  • Severity assessment and recommended remediation approach
  • Availability for questions during the fix

Timeline commitment: Resolved before we begin any other work this sprint.

I’ll provide updates every 4 hours until this is closed. Please escalate immediately if the situation changes or severity is higher than initially assessed.


To CEO

Subject: Friday Delivery - Confirmed with Security Caveat

Hi [CEO name],

Your customer commitment for Friday is my second priority this sprint, immediately after the security issue that just surfaced.

Current situation:
The security team identified a vulnerability that requires immediate remediation. This is a 1-2 day effort that must come first—I know you’d agree that we can’t deliver a customer promise on a compromised product.

Friday commitment:
Once security is resolved (targeting end of day tomorrow), the full team pivots to your customer deliverable. Based on initial scoping, I’m confident we can deliver by Friday.

Risk mitigation:

  • If security takes longer than expected, I’ll alert you by Wednesday EOD
  • In that scenario, we may need you to buy us 24-48 hours with the customer

Request: Can you share the specific deliverables the customer is expecting? I want to ensure we’re building exactly what you promised.

I’ll send a confidence update Wednesday morning.


To Marketing Team

Subject: Campaign Feature - Plan and Timeline

Hi Marketing team,

I know you’re counting on [feature] for next week’s campaign launch. Here’s where we stand and what we can commit to.

Current situation:
Two urgent priorities landed this sprint: a security vulnerability (non-negotiable) and a CEO customer commitment due Friday. These must come first.

Your feature timeline:

  • Work begins: Friday afternoon / Monday
  • Estimated completion: [X days after start]
  • Target delivery: Before campaign launch (but tight)

Options to consider:

  1. Slight campaign delay (recommended): Push launch 2-3 days to ensure feature is solid and tested. Better to launch late than launch broken.

  2. Phased approach: Launch campaign with partial feature set. Add remaining functionality in first few days.

  3. Scope reduction: Is there a smaller version of the feature that delivers 80% of the value? Could be ready faster.

Request: Can we meet today to discuss which option works best for your campaign goals? I want to find a solution that works for you.

What time works for a 20-minute sync?


ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS

If Security Fix Takes Longer Than Expected

Option A: Split the team

  • 3 engineers on security, 2 begin CEO deliverable
  • Risk: Security may need all hands
  • Mitigation: Only if security team confirms scoped fix

Option B: Negotiate Friday deadline

  • CEO requests 24-48 hour extension with customer
  • Framing: “We’re prioritizing quality and security to ensure this is bulletproof”
  • Only if CEO has relationship capital with customer

If CEO Deliverable Is Larger Than Expected

Option A: Scope reduction

  • Identify MVP version of the promise
  • Deliver core commitment Friday, enhancements next week
  • CEO positions as “Phase 1”

Option B: Borrow resources

  • Can another team loan an engineer for 2 days?
  • Can we bring in a contractor for surge support?

If Marketing Feature Can’t Make Launch Date

Option A: “Coming Soon” positioning

  • Announce feature in campaign, available within days of launch
  • Creates anticipation rather than disappointment

Option B: Manual workaround

  • Marketing team handles feature benefit manually for first few days
  • Engineering delivers while campaign is running

Option C: Campaign reschedule

  • Push launch 3-5 days
  • Often less painful than launching with missing feature

PUSHBACK RESPONSES

From Marketing: “We’ve already committed to this launch date!”

Response: “I understand, and I want to find a solution. The security issue isn’t optional—we can’t launch any feature on a vulnerable product. Let’s look at the timeline: if security is resolved by Wednesday, we have Thursday through [launch day] to deliver your feature. That’s tight but possible. What I need from you is flexibility on one of these: launch date, feature scope, or willingness to have the feature go live 24-48 hours after launch. Which of those gives you the most room to work with?”

From CEO: “This customer is critical—nothing can delay Friday”

Response: “I agree this customer is critical, which is exactly why we need to fix the security issue first. If we deliver a feature on a compromised product and that customer’s data is breached, we lose far more than this deal—we lose the customer, our reputation, and potentially face legal consequences. My commitment: security is a 1-2 day fix. Starting today, we’ll be working on your deliverable by Wednesday at the latest. If anything changes, you’ll know immediately. Is there anything we can do today to begin parallel work on scoping your customer’s requirements?”

From Security: “This might take longer than 2 days”

Response: “Help me understand the scope. Walk me through the worst-case scenario. If this is a 5-day fix, I need to reset expectations with the CEO and marketing now. What’s the minimum we can do to eliminate immediate risk while we build the complete fix? Is there a patch-then-rebuild approach that gets us to ‘secure enough’ faster?”


TRADEOFF SUMMARY

This prioritization optimizes for:
✅ Security (non-negotiable foundation)
✅ External commitments (CEO promise has fixed deadline)
✅ Relationship preservation (offering alternatives to marketing)

Tradeoffs accepted:
⚠️ Marketing campaign may need to adjust timing or scope
⚠️ Team will be under pressure for the full sprint
⚠️ No buffer for unexpected complications

Critical dependencies:

  • Security fix must be truly 1-2 days (get confirmation)
  • CEO deliverable scope must be confirmed today
  • Marketing flexibility on at least one dimension

Decision confidence: HIGH for ranking, MEDIUM for timeline (need better effort estimates)


IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS

  1. Today, hour 1: Get security team briefing on vulnerability scope and estimated fix time
  2. Today, hour 2: Get CEO clarification on exact customer deliverables
  3. Today, hour 3: Size both security fix and CEO deliverable
  4. Today, hour 4: Meet with marketing to discuss timeline options
  5. End of day: Confirm plan or escalate if timeline is impossible