Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Crisis Reprioritization with Multiple Urgent Items
Security vulnerability, marketing campaign launch, and CEO customer promise all converge with conflicting deadlines. Demonstrates crisis prioritization framework balancing existential risk (security), external commitments (CEO promise), and internal flexibility (marketing). Includes emergency response timeline, stakeholder communications for breaking commitments, and alternative solutions for each scenario.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Security team found vulnerability, needs fix this sprint. Marketing campaign launches next week needing their feature. CEO roadmap promise to customer due Friday. Team of 5.
Output
What the skill generates for you
PRIORITY ANALYSIS
Framework Applied
Impact/Effort/Strategic Alignment with Risk Assessment
Stakeholder Requests Summary
| Request | Stakeholder | Effort | Urgency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security vulnerability fix | Security Team | Unknown (sprint-sized) | This sprint |
| Marketing feature | Marketing | Unknown | Next week (campaign launch) |
| CEO customer promise | CEO | Unknown | Friday |
Recommended Priority Ranking
đĽ PRIORITY 1: Security Vulnerability Fix - Immediate
Impact: CRITICAL
- Security vulnerabilities represent existential risk to the business
- Potential legal liability, compliance violations, data breaches
- Reputational damage if exploited could dwarf all other concerns
Effort: Sprint-sized (team of 5)
Strategic Alignment: HIGHEST
- Security is foundationalânothing else matters if the product is compromised
- No feature launch or customer promise outweighs protecting user data
Risk of Delay: EXTREME
- Vulnerabilities can be exploited at any moment
- Regulatory penalties, breach notification requirements
- Once exploited, damage is irreversible
- Every day delayed increases exposure window
Rationale: This is non-negotiable. Security vulnerabilities donât wait for convenient timing. A breach during the marketing campaign or while the CEO is presenting to the customer would be catastrophic. Fix this first, period.
đĽ PRIORITY 2: CEO Customer Promise - Due Friday
Impact: HIGH
- Direct executive commitment to customer
- CEO credibility and company reputation at stake
- Likely tied to significant revenue or strategic relationship
Effort: Unknown (needs immediate sizing)
Strategic Alignment: HIGH
- CEO-level commitments reflect company priorities
- Customer relationships are long-term assets
Risk of Delay: HIGH - Hard external deadline
- Friday is immovable
- CEO credibility damaged if promise broken
- Customer relationship potentially lost
- No negotiating with external deadlines
Rationale: CEO commitments to customers carry significant weight. Unlike internal priorities that can be renegotiated, external promises have fixed deadlines and relationship consequences. Ranks second only because security is non-negotiable.
đĽ PRIORITY 3: Marketing Campaign Feature - Next Week
Impact: MEDIUM-HIGH
- Campaign launch is scheduled, likely with external spend committed
- Marketing effectiveness depends on feature availability
- Revenue opportunity from campaign
Effort: Unknown (needs sizing)
Strategic Alignment: MEDIUM
- Supports growth goals
- But campaigns can be rescheduled more easily than security fixed
Risk of Delay: MEDIUM
- Campaign timing is somewhat flexible
- Marketing can potentially adjust messaging or delay launch
- Internal deadline vs. external commitment
Rationale: Marketing campaigns, while important, are the most flexible of these three. Launch dates can shift, messaging can pivot, or features can be positioned as âcoming soonâ instead of âavailable now.â The campaign team has more options than the security team or the CEO.
Recommended Timeline (This Sprint)
Days 1-2: Security vulnerability fix (top 2-3 engineers)
- All hands on security until resolved
- Remaining team begins scoping CEO commitment
Days 3-4: CEO customer promise (full team if needed)
- Security fix should be completed or near-complete
- Shift focus to Friday deadline
- Marketing feature scoping begins in parallel
Day 5 (Friday): Deliver CEO promise + marketing feature push begins
- CEO commitment delivered
- Begin marketing feature build
Days 6-7+: Marketing feature completion
- Target: completion before campaign launch
- If tight: negotiate launch delay or feature scope reduction
DRAFT STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
To Security Team
Subject: Security Fix - Top Priority, Starting Immediately
Security team,
Your vulnerability report is our top priority. Weâre pulling the team to address this immediately.
Whatâs happening:
- Starting remediation today
- Dedicating top engineers to this until resolved
- Other commitments are being delayed to make room
What we need from you:
- Full details of the vulnerability and reproduction steps
- Severity assessment and recommended remediation approach
- Availability for questions during the fix
Timeline commitment: Resolved before we begin any other work this sprint.
Iâll provide updates every 4 hours until this is closed. Please escalate immediately if the situation changes or severity is higher than initially assessed.
To CEO
Subject: Friday Delivery - Confirmed with Security Caveat
Hi [CEO name],
Your customer commitment for Friday is my second priority this sprint, immediately after the security issue that just surfaced.
Current situation:
The security team identified a vulnerability that requires immediate remediation. This is a 1-2 day effort that must come firstâI know youâd agree that we canât deliver a customer promise on a compromised product.
Friday commitment:
Once security is resolved (targeting end of day tomorrow), the full team pivots to your customer deliverable. Based on initial scoping, Iâm confident we can deliver by Friday.
Risk mitigation:
- If security takes longer than expected, Iâll alert you by Wednesday EOD
- In that scenario, we may need you to buy us 24-48 hours with the customer
Request: Can you share the specific deliverables the customer is expecting? I want to ensure weâre building exactly what you promised.
Iâll send a confidence update Wednesday morning.
To Marketing Team
Subject: Campaign Feature - Plan and Timeline
Hi Marketing team,
I know youâre counting on [feature] for next weekâs campaign launch. Hereâs where we stand and what we can commit to.
Current situation:
Two urgent priorities landed this sprint: a security vulnerability (non-negotiable) and a CEO customer commitment due Friday. These must come first.
Your feature timeline:
- Work begins: Friday afternoon / Monday
- Estimated completion: [X days after start]
- Target delivery: Before campaign launch (but tight)
Options to consider:
-
Slight campaign delay (recommended): Push launch 2-3 days to ensure feature is solid and tested. Better to launch late than launch broken.
-
Phased approach: Launch campaign with partial feature set. Add remaining functionality in first few days.
-
Scope reduction: Is there a smaller version of the feature that delivers 80% of the value? Could be ready faster.
Request: Can we meet today to discuss which option works best for your campaign goals? I want to find a solution that works for you.
What time works for a 20-minute sync?
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
If Security Fix Takes Longer Than Expected
Option A: Split the team
- 3 engineers on security, 2 begin CEO deliverable
- Risk: Security may need all hands
- Mitigation: Only if security team confirms scoped fix
Option B: Negotiate Friday deadline
- CEO requests 24-48 hour extension with customer
- Framing: âWeâre prioritizing quality and security to ensure this is bulletproofâ
- Only if CEO has relationship capital with customer
If CEO Deliverable Is Larger Than Expected
Option A: Scope reduction
- Identify MVP version of the promise
- Deliver core commitment Friday, enhancements next week
- CEO positions as âPhase 1â
Option B: Borrow resources
- Can another team loan an engineer for 2 days?
- Can we bring in a contractor for surge support?
If Marketing Feature Canât Make Launch Date
Option A: âComing Soonâ positioning
- Announce feature in campaign, available within days of launch
- Creates anticipation rather than disappointment
Option B: Manual workaround
- Marketing team handles feature benefit manually for first few days
- Engineering delivers while campaign is running
Option C: Campaign reschedule
- Push launch 3-5 days
- Often less painful than launching with missing feature
PUSHBACK RESPONSES
From Marketing: âWeâve already committed to this launch date!â
Response: âI understand, and I want to find a solution. The security issue isnât optionalâwe canât launch any feature on a vulnerable product. Letâs look at the timeline: if security is resolved by Wednesday, we have Thursday through [launch day] to deliver your feature. Thatâs tight but possible. What I need from you is flexibility on one of these: launch date, feature scope, or willingness to have the feature go live 24-48 hours after launch. Which of those gives you the most room to work with?â
From CEO: âThis customer is criticalânothing can delay Fridayâ
Response: âI agree this customer is critical, which is exactly why we need to fix the security issue first. If we deliver a feature on a compromised product and that customerâs data is breached, we lose far more than this dealâwe lose the customer, our reputation, and potentially face legal consequences. My commitment: security is a 1-2 day fix. Starting today, weâll be working on your deliverable by Wednesday at the latest. If anything changes, youâll know immediately. Is there anything we can do today to begin parallel work on scoping your customerâs requirements?â
From Security: âThis might take longer than 2 daysâ
Response: âHelp me understand the scope. Walk me through the worst-case scenario. If this is a 5-day fix, I need to reset expectations with the CEO and marketing now. Whatâs the minimum we can do to eliminate immediate risk while we build the complete fix? Is there a patch-then-rebuild approach that gets us to âsecure enoughâ faster?â
TRADEOFF SUMMARY
This prioritization optimizes for:
â
Security (non-negotiable foundation)
â
External commitments (CEO promise has fixed deadline)
â
Relationship preservation (offering alternatives to marketing)
Tradeoffs accepted:
â ď¸ Marketing campaign may need to adjust timing or scope
â ď¸ Team will be under pressure for the full sprint
â ď¸ No buffer for unexpected complications
Critical dependencies:
- Security fix must be truly 1-2 days (get confirmation)
- CEO deliverable scope must be confirmed today
- Marketing flexibility on at least one dimension
Decision confidence: HIGH for ranking, MEDIUM for timeline (need better effort estimates)
IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS
- Today, hour 1: Get security team briefing on vulnerability scope and estimated fix time
- Today, hour 2: Get CEO clarification on exact customer deliverables
- Today, hour 3: Size both security fix and CEO deliverable
- Today, hour 4: Meet with marketing to discuss timeline options
- End of day: Confirm plan or escalate if timeline is impossible
About This Skill
Navigate competing stakeholder priorities in product management using prioritization frameworks, underlying need analysis, and empathetic communication templates.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Redirecting Solution Request to Problem Discovery
VP Engineering proposes AI chatbot citing competitor parity without explaining user need. Demonstrates underlying need analysis with hypothesis generation, discovery questions to uncover real problems (likely onboarding friction), alternative solutions for different scenarios, and conversation guide for redirecting from premature solution to productive problem exploration.
Three Competing Quarterly Requests with Time Constraints
Classic multi-stakeholder scenario with CEO dashboard (4 weeks), Sales export button (3 days), and Support bug fixes (1 week). Demonstrates impact/effort/strategic alignment framework identifying quick wins and force multipliers, with week-by-week Q2 execution timeline and customized stakeholder communications for each request.