All examples for Success Metrics Definition Framework

Community Forum with Indirect Value Chain

Addresses the challenge of measuring features with indirect value (community -> engagement -> retention). Shows how to handle longer measurement horizons, attribution complexity, and the importance of measuring end outcomes rather than intermediate activity.

Input

What you provide to the skill

Creating a community forum for our learning platform. Users share study tips and form peer groups. This might increase retention indirectly through social connection and engagement, not direct feature usage.

Output

What the skill generates for you


PART 1: OUTCOME-FOCUSED OKR

Objective

Increase user retention and platform loyalty through authentic peer support and community belonging

  • Timeframe: Q1 2025
  • Owner: Product & Growth Team
  • Business Goal: Retention
  • Why Outcome-Focused: This describes the business outcome (retention through community connection), not the feature (forum). Even if we build a world-class forum, we could fail if it doesn’t actually improve retention.

Critical Note on Indirect Value Chain: This feature has an indirect value chain: Forum participation -> Social connection -> Engagement -> Retention. Primary success metric must measure the END outcome (retention), not intermediate steps (posts, comments). Measurement period must be longer (60-90 days minimum).

Key Results

KR1: Increase 90-day retention rate from baseline to +15 percentage points (Lagging)

  • Why this is an outcome: Measures whether community actually keeps users on the platform longer. Users could post extensively but still churn.
  • How feature influences it: Social bonds and peer accountability create switching costs.

KR2: Increase average session frequency by 25% for users active in community (Lagging)

  • Why this is an outcome: Measures behavior change (users returning more often), not just forum activity.
  • How feature influences it: Forum notifications and peer discussions create reasons to return.

KR3: Achieve 30% of active users participating in community within 60 days (Leading)

  • Why this is an outcome: Measures adoption of social behaviors, which predicts retention. Must be paired with retention metrics.
  • How feature influences it: Onboarding prompts and peer group suggestions drive initial participation.

KR4: Achieve NPS increase of +10 points among community participants (Quality)

  • Why this is an outcome: Measures whether community creates perceived value and advocacy.
  • How feature influences it: Positive peer interactions create emotional connection to platform.

Output Traps Avoided

  • Launch community forum with 1,000 posts/month - Post volume is activity, not retention outcome
  • Build peer group matching with 500 active groups - Groups formed != retention value created
  • Achieve 50% forum response rate within 24 hours - Response speed is nice-to-have, not business outcome

PART 2: METRICS & MEASUREMENT PLAN

Primary Metric (North Star)

90-Day Retention Rate (Community Cohort vs. Control)

Definition: % of users who remain active on platform 90 days after joining, measured separately for community participants vs. non-participants

Formula: 90-Day Retention = (Users active on Day 90 / Users who signed up 90 days ago) x 100%
Community Impact = Retention(participants) - Retention(non-participants)

Industry Benchmarks (2024-2025):

  • EdTech platforms with community: 35-50% 90-day retention
  • EdTech platforms without community: 20-30% 90-day retention
  • Community lift: +10-20 percentage points typical for successful implementations

Target: +15pp for community participants vs. non-participants
Measurement Period: Minimum 90 days from launch (early signals at 30 days but less predictive)

Secondary Metrics

  1. Average Session Frequency - STRONG METRIC (Lagging) - Target: 25% increase for community participants
  2. Community Participation Rate - USE WITH CAUTION (Leading) - Target: 30% within 60 days
  3. NPS Lift for Community Participants - STRONG METRIC (Quality) - Target: +10 points
  4. Peer Group Engagement Rate - USE WITH CAUTION (Diagnostic) - Target: 40%+ monthly active

Vanity Metrics to AVOID

  • Total Forum Posts/Comments (volume != retention value)
  • Number of Peer Groups Formed (groups formed != groups that retain users)
  • Forum Page Views (exposure != engagement or retention)
  • Average Response Time (speed != value)
  • Number of Likes/Reactions (low-effort signals != deep connection)

Analytics Events

  • community_post_created (user_id, post_type, topic_category)
  • community_first_participation (user_id, days_since_signup, participation_type)
  • peer_group_joined (user_id, group_id, group_type, join_method)
  • retention_milestone_reached (user_id, milestone: 30/60/90_day, community_participant, participation_level)
  • nps_survey_completed (user_id, nps_score, community_participant)

Dashboard Structure

  1. OKR Progress Dashboard - All 4 KRs with targets and 90-day tracking
  2. Retention Deep Dive - Cohort curves comparing community vs. non-community
  3. Community Participation Funnel - Viewed -> First Interaction -> Repeat -> Retained
  4. Session Frequency & Engagement - Trend comparison by participation level
  5. Peer Group Health - Active groups, engagement rates, group longevity

Review Cadence

  • Daily (First 2 weeks): Monitor technical issues, moderation needs, extreme low participation
  • Weekly (Weeks 3-12): Track 30-day retention early signals, participation trends, qualitative feedback
  • Monthly (Months 2-4): 60-day retention analysis, NPS surveys, segment analysis
  • Quarterly (90+ days): Full OKR assessment, statistical significance testing, ROI calculation

Critical Timeline Note: This feature requires minimum 90 days to measure primary success metric. Early signals helpful but less predictive.

Success Definition

OKR successful if (meet 3 of 4 KRs):

  • KR1: 90-day retention +15pp for community participants
  • KR2: Session frequency +25% for community-active users
  • KR3: 30%+ participation within 60 days
  • KR4: NPS +10 points for community participants

Rollback if: 90-day retention LOWER for community participants, session frequency decreased, NPS decreased, or high moderation burden without retention benefit

Key Considerations for Indirect Value Features

  1. Indirect Value Chain: Community -> Connection -> Engagement -> Retention (each step has losses)
  2. Long Measurement Horizon: 90+ days to see retention impact
  3. Attribution Complexity: Correlation != causation; need cohort comparisons
  4. Quality Over Quantity: High participation doesn’t guarantee value
  5. Network Effects: Needs critical mass (20-30%) to create peer effects