Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Customer Support Staff Personas
Generates 4 evidence-based personas from customer support research: Veteran Val (power users), Growing Grace (mid-level), New Nathan (onboarding), Struggling Sam (at-risk). Includes goals, pain points, JTBD, quotes, and actionable recommendations.
Input
What you provide to the skill
I have 10 interviews with customer support staff and 150 survey responses about their needs.
Output
What the skill generates for you
Executive Summary: User Personas for Customer Support Staff
Based on 10 interviews and 150 survey responses, we identified 4 personas:
- Veteran Support Val (30%) - Experienced support staff needing efficiency tools and knowledge sharing capabilities
- Growing Support Grace (40%) - Mid-level staff seeking better resources and escalation paths
- New Support Nathan (25%) - Recent hires requiring comprehensive training and structured guidance
- Struggling Support Sam (5%) - Overwhelmed staff considering leaving due to workload and tooling gaps
Persona 1: Veteran Support Val
Profile
- Age: 32-45
- Role: Senior Support Specialist, Support Team Lead, Tier 2/3 Support
- Company Size: 100-1000+ employees
- Team Size: 8-20 support agents
- Experience: 5-12 years in customer support
- Segment Size: 30% (45 survey respondents, 3 interviews)
Goals
- Resolve complex customer issues efficiently without repetitive research
- Mentor junior team members and share institutional knowledge
- Reduce resolution time through better tools and automation
- Focus on high-value problem-solving, not routine queries
- Influence product improvements based on customer feedback patterns
Pain Points (Ranked)
- Knowledge fragmentation - “I have to check 5 different systems to find the answer I need. Sometimes I just remember it instead of documenting where it is” (Interview #3)
- Repetitive questions - “I answer the same 20 questions every week. We need better self-service or tier 1 should handle these” (Interview #7)
- Inadequate escalation tools - “When I need engineering help, I have to manually compile screenshots, logs, and context. It takes 30 minutes just to create the ticket” (Interview #3)
- Limited influence on product - “I see the same bugs reported hundreds of times but have no way to prioritize them to the product team” (Survey, repeated 14x)
- Mentoring without structure - “I train new hires but it’s all ad-hoc. We need a proper knowledge base and training program” (Interview #7)
Jobs-to-be-Done
- When a complex technical issue arrives I want to access consolidated customer history, logs, and similar cases so I can resolve it in one session without switching contexts
- When I identify recurring customer pain points I want to surface these insights to product teams so they can prioritize fixes and reduce future ticket volume
- When junior staff get stuck I want to share my solution approaches efficiently so they can learn without me repeating the same explanation
Supporting Quotes
- “I’ve been doing this 8 years. I can solve most issues in 10 minutes if the tools just gave me what I need upfront” (Interview #3)
- “Half my value is knowing which systems to check and who to ask. That shouldn’t be my competitive advantage - it should be built into the platform” (Interview #7)
- “I maintain a personal Notion doc with 200+ solutions because our official knowledge base is a mess” (Interview #10)
- “When I escalate to engineering, they ask for the same 6 things every time. Why can’t the system just collect that automatically?” (Interview #3)
- “I could train two new hires in the time I spend fighting with our ticketing system each week” (Interview #7)
Product Recommendations
- Priority 1: Unified customer context view (all history, logs, previous tickets in one interface)
- Priority 2: Automated escalation packet creation (auto-collect logs, screenshots, repro steps)
- Priority 3: Knowledge base with contribution workflow and search that actually works
Persona 2: Growing Support Grace
Profile
- Age: 25-35
- Role: Support Specialist, Customer Success Associate, Tier 1/2 Support
- Experience: 2-5 years in customer support
- Segment Size: 40% (60 survey respondents, 4 interviews)
Goals
- Resolve customer issues independently without constant escalation
- Build expertise in specific product areas
- Improve personal metrics (resolution time, CSAT scores)
Pain Points (Ranked)
- Unclear escalation criteria - “I waste time trying to solve things I shouldn’t, or escalate too early and get sent back” (Interview #2)
- Incomplete knowledge base - “The KB has basics but nothing for the weird edge cases I get daily” (Interview #5)
- Limited product training - “We get a 2-week onboarding then you’re on your own” (Interview #8)
Product Recommendations
- Priority 1: Smart search with suggested solutions based on ticket content
- Priority 2: Clear escalation decision trees and criteria built into workflow
- Priority 3: Structured learning paths with product area specializations
Persona Comparison Matrix
| Dimension | Veteran Val | Growing Grace | New Nathan | Struggling Sam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment Size | 30% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| Usage Frequency | Daily (all day) | Daily (full shifts) | Daily (full shifts) | Daily (reluctantly) |
| Primary Goal | Efficiency & mentoring | Skill development | Competent onboarding | Survive workload |
| Main Pain Point | Knowledge fragmentation | Unclear escalation | Information overload | Crushing workload |
| Product Priority | Advanced tools | Learning resources | Guided workflows | Automation & relief |
Evidence Trail
Persona 1: Veteran Support Val
- Interviews: #3, #7, #10
- Survey filter: experience >= 5 years AND role LIKE “%senior%” OR “%lead%”
Persona 2: Growing Support Grace
- Interviews: #2, #5, #8
- Survey filter: experience = 2-5 years AND role LIKE “%specialist%”
Methodology Notes
Clustering Approach: Manual pattern recognition based on qualitative analysis
Sample Size: 10 interviews + 150 surveys = 160 data points
Validation: Each persona represents 10%+ of user base with distinct pain points
About This Skill
Synthesize user research into evidence-based personas with demographics, goals, pain points, and actionable recommendations.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Data Sufficiency Assessment
When research data falls below minimum thresholds, the skill provides honest assessment with options: wait for more data or proceed with provisional personas. Includes margin of error calculations and specific guidance.
SaaS Product User Personas
Comprehensive persona system from 25 interviews and 400 surveys: Strategic Sarah (executives), Tactical Tom (daily managers), Occasional Olivia (periodic users), Struggling Sam (adoption-challenged). Full comparison matrix and evidence trail.