Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
VP Product Feature Approval
Simple baseline case: preparing for a straightforward feature approval meeting with a data-driven VP Product. Demonstrates core brief structure with anticipated questions, talking points, and success criteria.
Input
What you provide to the skill
I need to meet with Linda, our VP Product. She’s data-driven and likes direct communication. We need her approval for a new feature. No prior commitments or issues.
Output
What the skill generates for you
MEETING PREP BRIEF: Linda (VP Product) - New Feature Approval
=== KEY CONTEXT ===
Linda’s Communication Style:
- Data-driven: Lead with metrics, evidence, benchmarks
- Direct: No fluff, get to the point quickly
- Decision-focused: Come prepared with clear ask
Previous Commitments:
(None to track)
Hot Buttons to AVOID:
(None identified - clean slate)
=== ANTICIPATED QUESTIONS ===
Q: “What data supports this feature?”
A: “Provide specific metrics: customer requests (number, revenue impact),
market analysis (competitor offerings, adoption rates), usage projections
(based on similar features), and revenue impact (ARR, retention improvement).”
Q: “What’s the ROI?”
A: “Show clear numbers: development cost vs projected revenue/retention benefit,
time to break-even, customer acquisition or retention improvement percentage.”
Q: “What’s the timeline?”
A: “Give specific dates: development start, milestone checkpoints, beta launch,
general availability. Example: ‘Start June 1, beta August 15, GA September 30.’”
Q: “What are the risks?”
A: “Identify 2-3 key risks with mitigation plans: technical complexity (mitigation),
resource constraints (mitigation), market timing (mitigation).”
Q: “How does this fit our strategy?”
A: “Connect feature to product roadmap priorities, company OKRs, or strategic initiatives.
Show alignment with existing direction.”
=== TALKING POINTS ===
Lead with the ask:
- “Requesting approval for [Feature Name]”
- “Development timeline: [X weeks], resources: [Y engineers]”
- “Projected impact: [revenue/retention/acquisition metric]”
Support with data:
- “Customer demand: [X requests representing $Y ARR]”
- “Market gap: [competitors offering this, adoption data]”
- “ROI: Break-even in [timeframe], [X]x return within [timeframe]”
Show you’ve thought it through:
- “Key risks: [Risk 1], [Risk 2] with mitigations in place”
- “Success metrics: [specific, measurable outcomes]”
- “Resource impact: [who, how long, tradeoffs]”
=== THINGS TO BRING ===
📄 Feature Specification (one-pager with clear scope)
📄 Customer Evidence (requests, revenue at stake, quotes)
📄 Competitive Analysis (who has this, market adoption)
📄 ROI Model (costs vs benefits, timeline to value)
📄 Resource Plan (team allocation, timeline, dependencies)
📄 Risk Assessment (top risks with mitigation strategies)
=== SUCCESS CRITERIA ===
✅ Primary: Get explicit approval to proceed with development
✅ Critical: Alignment on scope, timeline, and resources
✅ Important: Clarity on success metrics and checkpoints
Fallback: Conditional approval pending specific data points,
or approval to build MVP/prototype for validation before
full commitment.
=== MEETING TONE ===
DO:
✓ Start with bottom line (the ask)
✓ Use specific numbers and dates
✓ Show clear business case
✓ Be ready to answer tough questions
DON’T:
✗ Bury the ask in background
✗ Use vague language (“pretty soon”, “lots of customers”)
✗ Focus on technical details over business impact
✗ Come unprepared with data
CONFIDENCE: HIGH if you bring solid data, clear ROI, specific
timeline, and thoughtful risk analysis. Linda appreciates
preparation and directness.
ESTIMATED TIME: 30 minutes
About This Skill
Generate comprehensive meeting prep briefs for product managers meeting with stakeholders. Creates context reminders, anticipated questions, tailored talking points, and identifies commitments to fulfill.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Multi-Stakeholder Infrastructure Budget Request
Edge case: group meeting with three stakeholders who have conflicting priorities (CFO wants ROI, VP Eng worries about tech debt, Support needs relief) and historical tension. Demonstrates advanced stakeholder dynamics handling.
Head of Sales Feature Delay Request
Realistic complexity: navigating a difficult ask (feature delay) with a relationship-focused stakeholder while managing an overdue commitment. Shows how the skill handles trust deficits and Q4 target concerns.