All examples for User Story Consistency Formatter

Completing a Partial User Story

Takes a user story with role and goal but missing benefit, then adds context to role and articulates clear value. Demonstrates how to strengthen partially-complete stories.

Input

What you provide to the skill

As a customer support agent, I want to filter conversations by date range

Output

What the skill generates for you

User Story Analysis

Original: “As a customer support agent, I want to filter conversations by date range”

Issues Detected:
⚠️ Role lacks specific context (what kind of support agent? in what situation?)
⚠️ Goal could be more specific (what date range granularity? single or multiple filters?)
❌ Missing benefit (no “so that…” - why is date filtering needed?)


Formatted User Story

As a customer support agent reviewing historical support tickets,
I want to filter conversations by selecting a start date and end date from a calendar picker,
So that I can quickly analyze support volume trends and review interactions from specific time periods.


Component Validation

Role: “customer support agent reviewing historical support tickets”

  • Specific: Yes (defines job function and context of use)
  • Authentic: Yes (real persona with clear workflow need)

Goal: “filter conversations by selecting a start date and end date from a calendar picker”

  • Specific: Yes (defines interaction method and both date parameters)
  • Testable: Yes (can verify date range filtering works correctly)
  • User-focused: Yes (describes user action and interface element)

Benefit: “quickly analyze support volume trends and review interactions from specific time periods”

  • Clear value: Yes (efficiency in analysis and historical review)
  • Outcome-oriented: Yes (focuses on analytical capability)
  • Measurable: Can track time saved in finding historical conversations

Improvements Made

  1. Added role context: Changed generic “customer support agent” to “customer support agent reviewing historical support tickets” to clarify when this feature is used
  2. Specified interaction details: Added “selecting a start date and end date from a calendar picker” to make the goal testable and implementation-guideable
  3. Added missing benefit: Included “so that I can quickly analyze support volume trends and review interactions from specific time periods” to explain the value
  4. Clarified use cases: Benefit articulates both analytical (volume trends) and operational (reviewing specific interactions) value

Suggested Enhancements

Consider adding:

  • Acceptance criteria: “Filter updates results within 2 seconds for up to 10,000 conversations”
  • Edge cases: Invalid date ranges, future dates, timezone handling
  • Success metrics: % reduction in time to find historical conversations, daily active users of date filter

Alternative framings:

  • For managers: “As a support team manager preparing quarterly reviews, I want to filter conversations by date range, so that I can generate performance reports for specific business periods”
  • For quality assurance: “As a QA specialist conducting audits, I want to filter conversations by date range, so that I can randomly sample tickets from last month for quality assessment”