All examples for User Story Consistency Formatter

Technical Task to User Story

Transforms a developer-focused technical task into a proper user story with specific role, testable goal, and articulated benefit. Shows how to preserve intent while shifting from implementation to user perspective.

Input

What you provide to the skill

Add search functionality to the dashboard

Output

What the skill generates for you

User Story Analysis

Original: “Add search functionality to the dashboard”

Issues Detected:
❌ Missing role (no “As a…” - who is searching?)
❌ Technical task framing (feature-focused, not user-focused)
❌ Unclear goal (what are they searching for? how?)
❌ Missing benefit (no “so that…” - why search?)


Formatted User Story

As a manager monitoring team performance and KPIs,
I want to search dashboard widgets and data visualizations by metric name, date range, or team member,
So that I can quickly find specific insights without scrolling through the entire dashboard and make data-driven decisions faster.


Component Validation

Role: “manager monitoring team performance and KPIs”

  • Specific: Yes (defines job function and use case)
  • Authentic: Yes (real user persona with clear need)

Goal: “search dashboard widgets and data visualizations by metric name, date range, or team member”

  • Specific: Yes (identifies what can be searched and search criteria)
  • Testable: Yes (can verify all three search types work)
  • User-focused: Yes (describes user action, not technical implementation)

Benefit: “quickly find specific insights without scrolling through the entire dashboard and make data-driven decisions faster”

  • Clear value: Yes (time savings + better decision-making)
  • Outcome-oriented: Yes (focuses on efficiency and decision quality)
  • Measurable: Can track time to find insights, search usage rate

Improvements Made

  1. Added specific role: Changed technical directive to “manager monitoring team performance and KPIs” with context
  2. Transformed goal: Changed “add search functionality” to describe what users want to search for (metric name, date range, team member)
  3. Added missing benefit: Explains why search is needed (find insights faster, improve decision-making)
  4. Removed implementation language: Focused on user need instead of “add functionality”

Suggested Enhancements

Consider adding:

  • Acceptance criteria: “Search returns results in under 2 seconds for 1000+ data points”
  • Acceptance criteria: “Search supports partial matches and filters (AND/OR logic)”
  • Edge cases: Empty results state, typo handling, saved searches
  • Success metrics: % of dashboard users who use search weekly, average time to find metric

Alternative framings:

  • For executives: “As an executive preparing for board meetings, I want to search for specific quarterly metrics across all departments…”
  • For analysts: “As a data analyst creating reports, I want to search historical dashboard data by custom date ranges…”
  • For team leads: “As a team lead in daily standups, I want to search for individual team member performance metrics…”

Related technical tasks (separate from user story):

  • “Implement ElasticSearch indexing for dashboard widgets”
  • “Add debounced search input with autocomplete”
  • “Create search results ranking algorithm based on relevance”