Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Facebook Campaign Headline and CTA Analysis
Analyzes a 5-ad Facebook campaign to identify winning headline types and CTAs. Demonstrates performance breakdown by creative element with lift percentages, individual ad ranking, and prioritized budget reallocation recommendations.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Analyze this Facebook campaign CSV - identify winning headlines and CTAs: Ad_Name,Headline_Type,CTA,Impressions,CTR
F1,Question,Shop Now,45000,3.2%
F2,Urgency,Buy Now,32000,2.5%
F3,Generic,Learn More,28000,1.4%
F4,Question,Get Started,38000,2.9%
F5,Value Prop,Shop Now,41000,2.6%
Output
What the skill generates for you
Ad Creative Performance Analysis Report
Campaign Overview
- Total Ads Analyzed: 5
- Total Impressions: 184,000
- Average CTR: 2.52%
Executive Summary
Top Performers:
- Best Overall Ad: F1 (Question headline + “Shop Now” CTA) - 3.2% CTR
- Best Headline Type: Question-based headlines (avg 3.05% CTR)
- Best CTA: “Shop Now” (avg 2.9% CTR)
Key Insight: Question-based headlines significantly outperform other types, achieving 21% higher CTR than the campaign average. Urgency headlines underperform relative to engagement potential.
Detailed Performance Analysis
1. Headline Type Performance
| Headline Type | Avg CTR | Ads | Total Impressions | Performance vs Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question | 3.05% | 2 | 83,000 | +21.0% |
| Value Prop | 2.60% | 1 | 41,000 | +3.2% |
| Urgency | 2.50% | 1 | 32,000 | -0.8% |
| Generic | 1.40% | 1 | 28,000 | -44.4% |
Analysis:
- Question headlines are clear winners, generating the highest engagement
- Generic headlines severely underperform (-44.4% vs avg) and should be eliminated
- Urgency headlines show promise but need refinement - CTR is below expectations given the psychological trigger
2. CTA Performance
| CTA | Avg CTR | Ads | Total Impressions | Performance vs Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shop Now | 2.90% | 2 | 86,000 | +15.1% |
| Get Started | 2.90% | 1 | 38,000 | +15.1% |
| Buy Now | 2.50% | 1 | 32,000 | -0.8% |
| Learn More | 1.40% | 1 | 28,000 | -44.4% |
Analysis:
- “Shop Now” and “Get Started” tie for best performance at 2.9% CTR
- “Learn More” dramatically underperforms - too passive for this audience
- “Buy Now” may be too aggressive; “Shop Now” frames the same action more invitingly
3. Individual Ad Performance
| Rank | Ad | Headline Type | CTA | Impressions | CTR | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F1 | Question | Shop Now | 45,000 | 3.2% | Top performer - winning combination |
| 2 | F4 | Question | Get Started | 38,000 | 2.9% | Strong - softer CTA works well |
| 3 | F5 | Value Prop | Shop Now | 41,000 | 2.6% | Solid mid-tier performance |
| 4 | F2 | Urgency | Buy Now | 32,000 | 2.5% | Underperforming given urgency angle |
| 5 | F3 | Generic | Learn More | 28,000 | 1.4% | Poor - eliminate this combination |
Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Next 48 Hours)
- Pause F3 immediately - Generic headline + “Learn More” CTA is draining budget at 44% below average performance
- Scale F1 budget by 50% - Clear winner deserves more investment
- Increase F4 budget by 25% - Second-best performer with room to scale
Short-Term Optimizations (Next 1-2 Weeks)
- Create 3 new Question headline variants with “Shop Now” CTA (following F1’s winning formula)
- Test “Get Started” CTA on Value Prop and Urgency headlines - it may outperform current CTAs
- Revise or replace F2 - Urgency headlines should perform better; test stronger urgency language or time-bound offers
- Eliminate “Learn More” CTAs from all future tests - too passive for this audience
Testing Strategy (Next 30 Days)
- Develop 5 new Question-based headlines - this format clearly resonates
- Test “Shop Now” vs “Get Started” head-to-head with identical headlines to determine definitive winner
- Experiment with hybrid approaches - “Value Prop + Question” format (e.g., “Save 50% Today - Ready to Transform Your Space?”)
- A/B test urgency elements - compare time-bound (“24 Hours Left”) vs scarcity (“Limited Stock”) vs FOMO (“Join 10,000+ Happy Customers”)
Budget Reallocation
Recommended Budget Shifts:
- F1: +50% (from 24.5% to 36.75%)
- F4: +25% (from 20.7% to 25.88%)
- F5: maintain (22.3%)
- F2: -25% (from 17.4% to 13.05%)
- F3: -100% (pause - was 15.2%)
Key Learnings
- Question headlines create engagement - They invite interaction and curiosity, driving higher CTR
- CTA tone matters - “Shop Now” outperforms “Buy Now” despite similar meaning; softer language converts better
- Generic messaging fails - Specific, compelling headlines are essential; generic copy doesn’t cut through noise
- Urgency needs execution refinement - While theoretically strong, F2’s urgency angle underperforms; test stronger urgency triggers
Statistical Confidence Notes
- F1’s 3.2% CTR represents a 27% lift over average - statistically significant given 45K impressions
- F3’s 1.4% CTR is 44% below average with 28K impressions - clear underperformer
- Question headlines (83K combined impressions) show consistent outperformance - high confidence in pattern
- “Shop Now” CTA tested across 2 different headline types (86K impressions) - reliable performance indicator
Next Review: Schedule follow-up analysis in 14 days after implementing immediate actions to measure impact of optimization.
About This Skill
Analyze ad creative performance to identify winning patterns, detect creative fatigue, and generate optimization recommendations from campaign CSV data.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Google Ads Basic Performance Analysis
Analyzes a Google Ads test with minimal data (only required columns). Demonstrates handling of limited data gracefully while still providing useful performance ranking, winner identification, and recommendations to collect more detailed data.
LinkedIn Campaign Fatigue Analysis
Analyzes a declining LinkedIn campaign with weekly time-series data to detect creative fatigue. Demonstrates fatigue detection with decline metrics, frequency crisis identification, and immediate pause/refresh recommendations.