Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
B2B SaaS Four-Channel Demo Comparison
Comparing four diverse B2B channels (Google Ads CPC, LinkedIn InMail CPS, Content Syndication CPL, and Webinars flat-fee) to identify the most efficient path to demo requests. Demonstrates handling different pricing models without revenue data.
Input
What you provide to the skill
B2B SaaS: Google $15k/3000 clicks/45 demos, LinkedIn InMail $4k/800 sends/100 clicks/20 demos, Content Synd $8k/300 leads/15 demos, Webinars $2k flat/50 attendees/12 demos
Output
What the skill generates for you
Cross-Channel Performance Analysis - B2B SaaS
Normalized Metrics Summary
| Channel | Spend | Demos | Cost/Demo | Lead Gen Cost | Efficiency Score | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn InMail | $4,000 | 20 | $200.00 | $40.00/click | 100% (best) | Low |
| Webinars | $2,000 | 12 | $166.67 | $40.00/attendee | 120% | Low |
| Google Ads | $15,000 | 45 | $333.33 | $5.00/click | 60% | High |
| Content Synd | $8,000 | 15 | $533.33 | $26.67/lead | 38% | Medium |
Detailed Channel Breakdown
Webinars (Best Efficiency)
- Original model: Flat fee - $2,000 total
- Attendees: 50
- Effective cost per attendee: $40.00
- Demo request rate: 24% (12/50 attendees)
- Cost per demo: $166.67 - Lowest
- Quality indicator: High intent (attended live event)
LinkedIn InMail
- Original model: CPS (Cost Per Send) - $5.00/message (estimated)
- Messages sent: 800
- Opens: Not specified (estimated ~400 at 50% open rate)
- Clicks: 100
- Effective CPC: $40.00 ($4,000 / 100 clicks)
- Demo request rate: 20% (20/100 clicks)
- Cost per demo: $200.00
- Quality indicator: Direct decision-maker outreach
Google Ads
- Original model: CPC - $5.00/click
- Clicks: 3,000
- Demo request rate: 1.5% (45/3,000 clicks)
- Cost per demo: $333.33
- Quality indicator: Search intent, broad audience
Content Syndication
- Original model: CPL (Cost Per Lead) - $26.67/lead
- Leads delivered: 300
- Demo request rate: 5% (15/300 leads)
- Cost per demo: $533.33 - Highest
- Quality indicator: Low conversion suggests lead quality issues
Channel Rankings
By Efficiency (Cost per Demo):
- Webinars: $166.67/demo - Best efficiency
- LinkedIn InMail: $200.00/demo (+20% vs Webinars)
- Google Ads: $333.33/demo (+100% vs Webinars)
- Content Syndication: $533.33/demo (+220% vs Webinars)
By Conversion Quality:
- Webinars: 24% attendee-to-demo rate (highest intent)
- LinkedIn InMail: 20% click-to-demo rate (targeted outreach)
- Content Syndication: 5% lead-to-demo rate (quality concerns)
- Google Ads: 1.5% click-to-demo rate (broad traffic)
By Volume Delivered:
- Google Ads: 45 demos (highest volume)
- LinkedIn InMail: 20 demos
- Content Syndication: 15 demos
- Webinars: 12 demos (lowest volume)
Insights and Recommendations
Scale Webinars
- Best efficiency at $166.67/demo
- Highest conversion quality (24% attendee-to-demo)
- Dual benefit: Lead generation + product education
- Low volume (12 demos) indicates significant room to scale
- Action: Increase frequency from current level to 2x/month, test topic variations, co-marketing partnerships to expand reach
- Budget recommendation: Increase to $4,000-6,000/month (2-3 webinars)
Maintain and Optimize LinkedIn InMail
- Strong efficiency at $200/demo (second-best)
- High conversion quality (20% click-to-demo)
- Direct access to decision-makers
- Limited scale (depends on target account list size)
- Action: Maintain $4,000 spend, improve messaging/targeting to increase click rate from 12.5% to 15%+
- Test personalization at scale and A/B test subject lines
Audit Google Ads
- Highest volume (45 demos) but expensive at $333/demo
- Low conversion quality (1.5%) indicates broad/low-intent traffic
- 2x more expensive than webinars per demo
- Action: Reduce budget by 30% to $10,000, focus on high-intent keywords (competitor terms, solution-specific phrases)
- Eliminate broad match keywords that dilute performance
Reassess Content Syndication
- Most expensive at $533.33/demo (3.2x worse than webinars)
- Very poor lead quality (5% lead-to-demo rate)
- $26.67/lead seems reasonable but downstream conversion is terrible
- Action: Cut spend by 75% to $2,000 or pause entirely; demand better lead quality from vendor or switch providers
Budget Reallocation Scenario
Current State: $29,000 total spend -> 92 demos -> $315.22/demo average
Optimized Budget:
- Webinars: $2,000 -> $6,000 (+$4,000)
- 12 -> 36 demos (+24 demos)
- LinkedIn InMail: $4,000 -> $4,000 (maintain)
- 20 demos (same)
- Google Ads: $15,000 -> $10,000 (-$5,000)
- 45 -> 30 demos (-15 demos)
- Content Syndication: $8,000 -> $1,000 (-$7,000)
- 15 -> 2 demos (-13 demos)
New Total: $21,000 spend -> 88 demos (-4 demos) -> $238.64/demo
Net Impact:
- 28% budget reduction ($8,000 saved)
- Only 4 fewer demos (4% volume decrease)
- 24% improvement in cost per demo efficiency
- Better quality demos from high-intent channels
Alternative Aggressive Scenario
If you reinvest savings into top performers:
- Webinars: $2,000 -> $8,000 (+$6,000) -> 48 demos (+36)
- LinkedIn InMail: $4,000 -> $8,000 (+$4,000) -> 40 demos (+20)
- Google Ads: $15,000 -> $10,000 (-$5,000) -> 30 demos (-15)
- Content Syndication: $8,000 -> $0 (-$8,000) -> 0 demos (-15)
New Total: $26,000 spend -> 118 demos (+26 demos) -> $220.34/demo
Net Impact:
- 10% budget reduction ($3,000 saved)
- 28% increase in demo volume (+26 demos)
- 30% improvement in cost per demo efficiency
Quality Checks Needed
-
Demo-to-Close Rate by Channel: Pull conversion data from CRM
- If Content Syndication demos close at 40%+ vs 10% for others, the high cost per demo may be justified
- If Webinar attendees close at same/better rate than paid channels, the efficiency advantage is real and even understated
-
Deal Size by Channel: Analyze ACV/contract value
- Google Ads may attract smaller customers (SMB) while webinars attract enterprise
- LinkedIn InMail targeting senior titles may yield larger deals
- Adjust cost per demo targets based on expected contract value
-
Sales Cycle Length: Track time from demo to close
- Webinar attendees may have longer consideration (education-first)
- Google search traffic may close faster (active shopping)
- Factor velocity into channel economics
-
Attribution Accuracy:
- Webinar attendees may have touched other channels first (Google search, LinkedIn ads)
- Consider multi-touch attribution model
- LinkedIn InMail likely last-touch (direct outreach)
Red Flags and Considerations
Content Syndication Warning Signs:
- 5% lead-to-demo conversion suggests either:
- Poor lead quality (form-fill farms, disengaged prospects)
- Misalignment between content topic and product
- Long nurture required (shouldn’t count as same-funnel stage)
- Recommendation: Request sample leads for manual review before next contract
Webinar Scalability Questions:
- Current 24% conversion is excellent but may not hold at 4x frequency
- Topic saturation: Can you produce quality content for 2-3 webinars/month?
- Audience fatigue: Will same target accounts attend multiple times?
- Recommendation: Start with 2x frequency, monitor conversion rate closely
Google Ads Volume Dependency:
- Delivers 49% of total demos (45/92)
- Cutting too aggressively may impact sales pipeline targets
- Recommendation: Phase reduction over 2-3 months while ramping webinars
Next Steps
-
Immediate (This Week):
- Pause or reduce Content Syndication to $1,000-2,000/month trial
- Plan next 2 webinar topics and secure dates
-
Short-term (Next 30 Days):
- Increase webinar budget to $4,000, execute 2 webinars
- Audit Google Ads account: eliminate broad match, focus on high-intent terms
- Reduce Google budget to $12,000 (20% cut) as test
-
Medium-term (Next Quarter):
- Scale webinars to $6,000-8,000/month (2-3 per month)
- Test LinkedIn InMail messaging improvements
- Further reduce Google to $10,000 if webinar scaling successful
- Pull close rate data by channel to validate efficiency rankings
-
Analysis Gap to Fill:
- Calculate CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) including sales costs
- Measure demo-to-customer conversion by channel
- Track ACV and LTV by acquisition channel
- Run incrementality test on one channel to validate attribution
About This Skill
Compare marketing channels with different pricing models (CPC, CPM, CPS). Normalize metrics to cost per conversion, ROAS, and ROI for apples-to-apples budget allocation.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
E-commerce CPC vs CPM Comparison
Comparing Google Ads (CPC model) against Facebook Ads (CPM model) for an e-commerce business. Demonstrates normalizing different pricing models to cost per conversion and ROAS, with budget reallocation recommendations based on efficiency rankings.
Local Plumber Channel Scalability Analysis
Comparing three channels for a local service business: Google Local Service Ads (pay-per-lead), Facebook Ads (CPC), and Direct Mail (flat fee). Focuses on answering which channel scales best for growth, with revenue projections.