All examples for Cross-Channel Performance Comparator

B2B SaaS Four-Channel Demo Comparison

Comparing four diverse B2B channels (Google Ads CPC, LinkedIn InMail CPS, Content Syndication CPL, and Webinars flat-fee) to identify the most efficient path to demo requests. Demonstrates handling different pricing models without revenue data.

Input

What you provide to the skill

B2B SaaS: Google $15k/3000 clicks/45 demos, LinkedIn InMail $4k/800 sends/100 clicks/20 demos, Content Synd $8k/300 leads/15 demos, Webinars $2k flat/50 attendees/12 demos

Output

What the skill generates for you

Cross-Channel Performance Analysis - B2B SaaS

Normalized Metrics Summary

Channel Spend Demos Cost/Demo Lead Gen Cost Efficiency Score Volume
LinkedIn InMail $4,000 20 $200.00 $40.00/click 100% (best) Low
Webinars $2,000 12 $166.67 $40.00/attendee 120% Low
Google Ads $15,000 45 $333.33 $5.00/click 60% High
Content Synd $8,000 15 $533.33 $26.67/lead 38% Medium

Detailed Channel Breakdown

Webinars (Best Efficiency)

  • Original model: Flat fee - $2,000 total
  • Attendees: 50
  • Effective cost per attendee: $40.00
  • Demo request rate: 24% (12/50 attendees)
  • Cost per demo: $166.67 - Lowest
  • Quality indicator: High intent (attended live event)

LinkedIn InMail

  • Original model: CPS (Cost Per Send) - $5.00/message (estimated)
  • Messages sent: 800
  • Opens: Not specified (estimated ~400 at 50% open rate)
  • Clicks: 100
  • Effective CPC: $40.00 ($4,000 / 100 clicks)
  • Demo request rate: 20% (20/100 clicks)
  • Cost per demo: $200.00
  • Quality indicator: Direct decision-maker outreach

Google Ads

  • Original model: CPC - $5.00/click
  • Clicks: 3,000
  • Demo request rate: 1.5% (45/3,000 clicks)
  • Cost per demo: $333.33
  • Quality indicator: Search intent, broad audience

Content Syndication

  • Original model: CPL (Cost Per Lead) - $26.67/lead
  • Leads delivered: 300
  • Demo request rate: 5% (15/300 leads)
  • Cost per demo: $533.33 - Highest
  • Quality indicator: Low conversion suggests lead quality issues

Channel Rankings

By Efficiency (Cost per Demo):

  1. Webinars: $166.67/demo - Best efficiency
  2. LinkedIn InMail: $200.00/demo (+20% vs Webinars)
  3. Google Ads: $333.33/demo (+100% vs Webinars)
  4. Content Syndication: $533.33/demo (+220% vs Webinars)

By Conversion Quality:

  1. Webinars: 24% attendee-to-demo rate (highest intent)
  2. LinkedIn InMail: 20% click-to-demo rate (targeted outreach)
  3. Content Syndication: 5% lead-to-demo rate (quality concerns)
  4. Google Ads: 1.5% click-to-demo rate (broad traffic)

By Volume Delivered:

  1. Google Ads: 45 demos (highest volume)
  2. LinkedIn InMail: 20 demos
  3. Content Syndication: 15 demos
  4. Webinars: 12 demos (lowest volume)

Insights and Recommendations

Scale Webinars

  • Best efficiency at $166.67/demo
  • Highest conversion quality (24% attendee-to-demo)
  • Dual benefit: Lead generation + product education
  • Low volume (12 demos) indicates significant room to scale
  • Action: Increase frequency from current level to 2x/month, test topic variations, co-marketing partnerships to expand reach
  • Budget recommendation: Increase to $4,000-6,000/month (2-3 webinars)

Maintain and Optimize LinkedIn InMail

  • Strong efficiency at $200/demo (second-best)
  • High conversion quality (20% click-to-demo)
  • Direct access to decision-makers
  • Limited scale (depends on target account list size)
  • Action: Maintain $4,000 spend, improve messaging/targeting to increase click rate from 12.5% to 15%+
  • Test personalization at scale and A/B test subject lines

Audit Google Ads

  • Highest volume (45 demos) but expensive at $333/demo
  • Low conversion quality (1.5%) indicates broad/low-intent traffic
  • 2x more expensive than webinars per demo
  • Action: Reduce budget by 30% to $10,000, focus on high-intent keywords (competitor terms, solution-specific phrases)
  • Eliminate broad match keywords that dilute performance

Reassess Content Syndication

  • Most expensive at $533.33/demo (3.2x worse than webinars)
  • Very poor lead quality (5% lead-to-demo rate)
  • $26.67/lead seems reasonable but downstream conversion is terrible
  • Action: Cut spend by 75% to $2,000 or pause entirely; demand better lead quality from vendor or switch providers

Budget Reallocation Scenario

Current State: $29,000 total spend -> 92 demos -> $315.22/demo average

Optimized Budget:

  • Webinars: $2,000 -> $6,000 (+$4,000)
    • 12 -> 36 demos (+24 demos)
  • LinkedIn InMail: $4,000 -> $4,000 (maintain)
    • 20 demos (same)
  • Google Ads: $15,000 -> $10,000 (-$5,000)
    • 45 -> 30 demos (-15 demos)
  • Content Syndication: $8,000 -> $1,000 (-$7,000)
    • 15 -> 2 demos (-13 demos)

New Total: $21,000 spend -> 88 demos (-4 demos) -> $238.64/demo

Net Impact:

  • 28% budget reduction ($8,000 saved)
  • Only 4 fewer demos (4% volume decrease)
  • 24% improvement in cost per demo efficiency
  • Better quality demos from high-intent channels

Alternative Aggressive Scenario

If you reinvest savings into top performers:

  • Webinars: $2,000 -> $8,000 (+$6,000) -> 48 demos (+36)
  • LinkedIn InMail: $4,000 -> $8,000 (+$4,000) -> 40 demos (+20)
  • Google Ads: $15,000 -> $10,000 (-$5,000) -> 30 demos (-15)
  • Content Syndication: $8,000 -> $0 (-$8,000) -> 0 demos (-15)

New Total: $26,000 spend -> 118 demos (+26 demos) -> $220.34/demo

Net Impact:

  • 10% budget reduction ($3,000 saved)
  • 28% increase in demo volume (+26 demos)
  • 30% improvement in cost per demo efficiency

Quality Checks Needed

  1. Demo-to-Close Rate by Channel: Pull conversion data from CRM

    • If Content Syndication demos close at 40%+ vs 10% for others, the high cost per demo may be justified
    • If Webinar attendees close at same/better rate than paid channels, the efficiency advantage is real and even understated
  2. Deal Size by Channel: Analyze ACV/contract value

    • Google Ads may attract smaller customers (SMB) while webinars attract enterprise
    • LinkedIn InMail targeting senior titles may yield larger deals
    • Adjust cost per demo targets based on expected contract value
  3. Sales Cycle Length: Track time from demo to close

    • Webinar attendees may have longer consideration (education-first)
    • Google search traffic may close faster (active shopping)
    • Factor velocity into channel economics
  4. Attribution Accuracy:

    • Webinar attendees may have touched other channels first (Google search, LinkedIn ads)
    • Consider multi-touch attribution model
    • LinkedIn InMail likely last-touch (direct outreach)

Red Flags and Considerations

Content Syndication Warning Signs:

  • 5% lead-to-demo conversion suggests either:
    • Poor lead quality (form-fill farms, disengaged prospects)
    • Misalignment between content topic and product
    • Long nurture required (shouldn’t count as same-funnel stage)
  • Recommendation: Request sample leads for manual review before next contract

Webinar Scalability Questions:

  • Current 24% conversion is excellent but may not hold at 4x frequency
  • Topic saturation: Can you produce quality content for 2-3 webinars/month?
  • Audience fatigue: Will same target accounts attend multiple times?
  • Recommendation: Start with 2x frequency, monitor conversion rate closely

Google Ads Volume Dependency:

  • Delivers 49% of total demos (45/92)
  • Cutting too aggressively may impact sales pipeline targets
  • Recommendation: Phase reduction over 2-3 months while ramping webinars

Next Steps

  1. Immediate (This Week):

    • Pause or reduce Content Syndication to $1,000-2,000/month trial
    • Plan next 2 webinar topics and secure dates
  2. Short-term (Next 30 Days):

    • Increase webinar budget to $4,000, execute 2 webinars
    • Audit Google Ads account: eliminate broad match, focus on high-intent terms
    • Reduce Google budget to $12,000 (20% cut) as test
  3. Medium-term (Next Quarter):

    • Scale webinars to $6,000-8,000/month (2-3 per month)
    • Test LinkedIn InMail messaging improvements
    • Further reduce Google to $10,000 if webinar scaling successful
    • Pull close rate data by channel to validate efficiency rankings
  4. Analysis Gap to Fill:

    • Calculate CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) including sales costs
    • Measure demo-to-customer conversion by channel
    • Track ACV and LTV by acquisition channel
    • Run incrementality test on one channel to validate attribution