Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Launch Delay from Sparse Meeting Notes
Documents a Q4 launch delay decision from very minimal notes. Demonstrates how the skill handles sparse input by creating reasonable structure and marking many sections for verification. Also captures team dissent (Sarah disagreed) appropriately.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Team voted to delay Q4 launch by 2 weeks. Not ready. Too many bugs. Sarah disagreed but went along with consensus.
Output
What the skill generates for you
DECISION LOG ENTRY
**Decision ID**: DEC-2025-1203
**Date**: 2025-12-03
**Decision**: Delay Q4 Launch by 2 Weeks
---
**DECISION SUMMARY**:
Q4 product launch postponed by 2 weeks due to unresolved bugs and readiness concerns.
---
**DECISION MAKER(S)**:
- Primary: Team vote (majority consensus)
- Dissenting: Sarah (disagreed but aligned with consensus)
---
**RATIONALE**:
Launch readiness assessment identified critical gaps requiring additional time:
1. **Quality concerns**: Too many bugs remaining in codebase
2. **Team readiness**: Overall team assessment concluded not ready to launch
3. **Risk mitigation**: 2-week delay allows time to address quality issues before customer exposure
Team voted to prioritize launch quality over original timeline.
---
**ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED**:
**Option A: Launch on Original Q4 Schedule**
- Risk: HIGH - Launch with known bugs, potential customer impact
- Sarah's position: [To be filled: Sarah's rationale for launching on time]
- Decision: REJECTED by team vote - Quality concerns outweighed timeline pressure
**Option B: Delay Launch by 2 Weeks (SELECTED)**
- Timeline: 2-week postponement
- Benefit: Additional time to address bugs, improve launch readiness
- Tradeoff: Q4 timeline miss
- Decision: SELECTED - Team consensus prioritized quality
---
**EXPECTED IMPACT**:
**Timeline:**
- Q4 launch date: Delayed 2 weeks
- [To be filled: New launch date]
**Customer:**
- [To be filled: Impact on customer commitments, expectations]
**Internal:**
- Engineering: 2 additional weeks for bug fixes
- [To be filled: Impact on other teams/projects]
**Financial:**
- [To be filled: Revenue impact from 2-week delay]
**Strategic:**
- Prioritizes launch quality over speed
- [To be filled: Market positioning impact]
---
**SUCCESS CRITERIA**:
1. [To be filled: Specific bug count/severity threshold for launch readiness]
2. Launch occurs within 2-week extension window
3. [To be filled: Post-launch quality metrics]
4. [To be filled: Customer satisfaction metrics]
---
**REVIEW DATE**: [To be filled: Date 1 week before new launch date for go/no-go assessment]
---
**RELATED DOCUMENTS**:
- Bug tracking report: [To be filled: link]
- Original Q4 launch plan: [To be filled: link]
- Launch readiness assessment: [To be filled: link]
---
**TAGS**: #launch-timeline #Q4-2025 #quality #bugs #consensus-decision
---
**STATUS**: APPROVED (2-week delay implemented)
---
**NOTES**:
- Sarah dissented but aligned with team consensus - [To be filled: capture Sarah's concerns for future reference]
- [To be filled: Specific bug categories/issues driving delay]
- [To be filled: Communication plan for stakeholders]
About This Skill
Transform rough decision notes into comprehensive, structured decision log entries with rationale, alternatives, stakeholders, and impact analysis.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Mobile App Sunset with Financial Analysis
Documents a strategic decision to sunset a mobile app in favor of web-only. Shows handling of financial data ($400K savings), usage metrics (8% mobile users), and multiple alternatives. Demonstrates appropriate [To be filled] markers for missing implementation details.
Technical Framework Selection
Documents a frontend framework decision (React vs Vue) with minimal input. Demonstrates how the skill infers reasonable structure from brief notes and creates comprehensive rationale around ecosystem and hiring considerations.