Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Mobile App Sunset with Financial Analysis
Documents a strategic decision to sunset a mobile app in favor of web-only. Shows handling of financial data ($400K savings), usage metrics (8% mobile users), and multiple alternatives. Demonstrates appropriate [To be filled] markers for missing implementation details.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Decided to sunset our mobile app and go web-only. CFO says saving $400K/yr. Only 8% of users on mobile. Alternatives: keep maintaining, outsource, rebuild. CEO approved yesterday.
Output
What the skill generates for you
DECISION LOG ENTRY
**Decision ID**: DEC-2025-1203
**Date**: 2025-12-03
**Decision**: Sunset Mobile App, Transition to Web-Only Platform
---
**DECISION SUMMARY**:
Mobile application will be discontinued in favor of a web-only platform strategy, eliminating mobile app development and maintenance.
---
**DECISION MAKER(S)**:
- Primary: CFO (financial analysis)
- Final Approval: CEO (approved yesterday)
- [To be filled: Who else was involved in the decision - Product, Engineering, Customer Success?]
---
**RATIONALE**:
Financial and usage data support sunsetting mobile in favor of web-only approach:
1. **Cost savings**: $400K/year reduction in mobile app development and maintenance costs
2. **Low mobile adoption**: Only 8% of users currently on mobile platform
3. **Resource optimization**: 92% of users already on web, consolidate engineering focus
4. **CEO approval**: Decision validated and approved
---
**ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED**:
**Option A: Keep Maintaining Mobile App**
- Cost: Continue $400K/year spend
- User coverage: Serves 8% of user base
- Decision: REJECTED - High cost for low adoption
**Option B: Outsource Mobile Development**
- [To be filled: Cost estimate for outsourcing?]
- [To be filled: Quality/control concerns with outsourcing?]
- Decision: REJECTED - [To be filled: Specific rejection reason]
**Option C: Rebuild Mobile App**
- [To be filled: What would rebuild address? Cost? Timeline?]
- Decision: REJECTED - [To be filled: Specific rejection reason]
**Option D: Sunset Mobile, Go Web-Only (SELECTED)**
- Cost: Saves $400K/year
- Impact: Affects 8% of users
- Benefit: Focus resources on 92% of user base
- Decision: SELECTED - Cost savings, resource focus, serves majority
---
**EXPECTED IMPACT**:
**Financial:**
- Annual savings: $400K/year (mobile development and maintenance)
- [To be filled: One-time costs for user migration, communication, sunset process?]
**Customer:**
- 92% of users: No impact (already using web)
- 8% of mobile users: Must transition to web platform
- [To be filled: Mobile-only use cases - are there users who cannot use web? (e.g., field workers, mobile-first workflows)]
**Internal:**
- Engineering: Eliminate mobile engineering headcount or redeploy to web platform
- Support: Reduced complexity, single platform support
- [To be filled: How many engineers affected? Redeployed or reduced headcount?]
**Strategic:**
- Simplified product strategy: Single web platform
- [To be filled: Competitive impact - do competitors offer mobile? Does this hurt competitive position?]
- [To be filled: Future mobile strategy - ruled out forever or revisit later?]
---
**SUCCESS CRITERIA**:
1. $400K annual cost savings realized
2. 8% mobile users successfully transitioned to web (target: 80%+ retention)
3. [To be filled: Timeline for sunset - when does mobile app shut down?]
4. [To be filled: User satisfaction maintained - NPS or CSAT targets during transition?]
---
**IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE**:
[To be filled:
- Communication plan to mobile users
- Sunset date for mobile app
- Support cutoff dates
- Migration support period]
---
**REVIEW DATE**: [To be filled: When to assess if decision was correct? 6 months post-sunset?]
---
**RELATED DOCUMENTS**:
- Financial analysis: $400K savings projection
- Usage analytics: 8% mobile vs. 92% web
- [To be filled: User migration plan]
- [To be filled: Customer communication plan]
- [To be filled: Competitive analysis]
---
**TAGS**: #mobile-app #sunset #cost-savings #web-only #platform-strategy #2025
---
**STATUS**: APPROVED (CEO approval received, implementation pending)
About This Skill
Transform rough decision notes into comprehensive, structured decision log entries with rationale, alternatives, stakeholders, and impact analysis.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
Launch Delay from Sparse Meeting Notes
Documents a Q4 launch delay decision from very minimal notes. Demonstrates how the skill handles sparse input by creating reasonable structure and marking many sections for verification. Also captures team dissent (Sarah disagreed) appropriately.
Technical Framework Selection
Documents a frontend framework decision (React vs Vue) with minimal input. Demonstrates how the skill infers reasonable structure from brief notes and creates comprehensive rationale around ecosystem and hiring considerations.