All examples for Social Media Time ROI Calculator

LinkedIn vs Twitter Multi-Platform Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of two platforms showing efficiency rankings, ROI calculations, and data-driven recommendations for time reallocation between LinkedIn and Twitter.

Input

What you provide to the skill

Compare LinkedIn vs Twitter: LinkedIn 2 hrs/week 15k impressions 80 clicks 8 signups; Twitter 5 hrs/week 40k impressions 120 clicks 6 signups. $75/hour, $49/month pricing, 25% conversion.

Output

What the skill generates for you

LinkedIn vs Twitter Social Media ROI Analysis

Summary: LinkedIn Delivers 5x Better Efficiency Despite Lower Impressions

Platform Hours/Mo Cost Revenue ROI Signups/Hr
LinkedIn 8 $600 $98.00 -83.7% 1.00
Twitter 20 $1,500 $73.50 -95.1% 0.30
Total 28 $2,100 $171.50 -91.8% 0.50

Platform Rankings

By Efficiency (signups per hour):

  1. LinkedIn: 1.00 signups/hr
  2. Twitter: 0.30 signups/hr

By Conversion Rate (link click → signup):

  1. LinkedIn: 10.0% (80 clicks → 8 signups)
  2. Twitter: 5.0% (120 clicks → 6 signups)

By ROI:

  1. LinkedIn: -83.7% (least negative)
  2. Twitter: -95.1%

Platform Breakdown

LinkedIn Performance

Time Investment:

  • Hours per week: 2
  • Hours per month: 8
  • Monthly cost: $600

Funnel Metrics:

15,000 impressions
80 link clicks (0.53% CTR)
↓ 10% conversion
8 signups
↓ 25% trial-to-paid
2 paying customers

Financial Analysis:

  • Monthly revenue: $98.00 (2 × $49)
  • Monthly cost: $600
  • Net profit: -$502.00
  • ROI: -83.7%

Efficiency Metrics:

  • Signups per hour: 1.00
  • Cost per signup: $75.00
  • Revenue per hour: $12.25

Breakeven Analysis:
To break even at $600/month cost, LinkedIn needs:

  • 49.0 signups/month (currently at 8)
  • OR 12.2 paying customers/month (currently at 2)
  • Gap: 41 additional signups needed (6.1x growth)

Twitter Performance

Time Investment:

  • Hours per week: 5
  • Hours per month: 20
  • Monthly cost: $1,500

Funnel Metrics:

40,000 impressions
120 link clicks (0.30% CTR)
↓ 5% conversion
6 signups
↓ 25% trial-to-paid
1.5 paying customers

Financial Analysis:

  • Monthly revenue: $73.50 (1.5 × $49)
  • Monthly cost: $1,500
  • Net profit: -$1,426.50
  • ROI: -95.1%

Efficiency Metrics:

  • Signups per hour: 0.30
  • Cost per signup: $250.00
  • Revenue per hour: $3.68

Breakeven Analysis:
To break even at $1,500/month cost, Twitter needs:

  • 122.4 signups/month (currently at 6)
  • OR 30.6 paying customers/month (currently at 1.5)
  • Gap: 116.4 additional signups needed (20.4x growth)

Strategic Insights

LinkedIn is Your Winner (Despite Negative ROI)

Why LinkedIn outperforms:

  • 3.3x more efficient per hour than Twitter (1.00 vs. 0.30 signups/hr)
  • 2x better conversion rate from clicks to signups (10% vs. 5%)
  • 3.3x lower cost per signup ($75 vs. $250)
  • Only 8 hours/month vs. Twitter’s 20 hours

Twitter: High Effort, Weak Returns

The problem:

  • 20 hours/month generating only 6 signups (0.30/hr)
  • 40,000 impressions but terrible click-through (0.30%)
  • 5% conversion suggests audience mismatch or weak content-to-landing page fit
  • Cost per signup ($250) is 3.3x higher than LinkedIn

The Hard Truth: Both Platforms Are ROI-Negative

Neither platform is close to profitable:

  • LinkedIn needs 6.1x more signups to break even
  • Twitter needs 20.4x more signups to break even

Recommended Reallocation

Current State (28 hrs/month total)

  • LinkedIn: 8 hours → 8 signups (1.00/hr)
  • Twitter: 20 hours → 6 signups (0.30/hr)

Proposed Reallocation (12 hrs/month social)

Platform Current Proposed Reasoning
LinkedIn 8 hrs 10 hrs Double down on efficiency leader (+25%)
Twitter 20 hrs 2 hrs Reduce to scheduled posts only (-90%)
Other channels 0 hrs 16 hrs Invest saved time elsewhere

Expected outcome (if efficiency holds):

  • LinkedIn signups: ~10/month (from 8)
  • Twitter signups: ~2/month (from 6)
  • Total from social: ~12 signups vs. current 14
  • Time saved: 16 hours/month ($1,200 value)

Alternative Channels to Test (16 saved hours)

Activity Est. Time Est. Signups Efficiency Monthly Cost Est. ROI
Current Social 28 hrs 14 0.50/hr $2,100 -91.8%
SEO blog content 12 hrs 8-20/month compounding 0.67-1.67/hr $900 -60% to +9%
Email newsletter 8 hrs 12-25 1.5-3.1/hr $600 -34% to +104%
Cold outreach 12 hrs 10-30 0.83-2.5/hr $900 -22% to +145%

Action Items

This Week

  • Install UTM tracking on all social media links (30 min)
  • Audit Twitter time usage for one week (track in spreadsheet)
  • Reduce Twitter to 2 hrs/week starting Monday
  • Draft first email newsletter issue (2 hrs)

Next 30 Days

  • Increase LinkedIn to 2.5 hrs/week (10 hrs/month)
  • Keep Twitter at 2 hrs/week (8 hrs/month)
  • Launch weekly email newsletter (8 hrs/month)
  • Write and publish 2 SEO blog posts (12 hrs/month)
  • Track all conversions with UTM parameters

Day 30 Evaluation

  • Pull UTM conversion data from analytics
  • Calculate actual ROI per channel (use real numbers)
  • Compare newsletter + blog vs. social media efficiency
  • Decide: continue, optimize, or cut each channel
  • Set Q2 marketing time allocation based on data

Final Verdict

LinkedIn: KEEP (but optimize)

  • Best performer by far (1.00 signups/hr)
  • Still negative ROI, but closest to breakeven
  • Increase to 2.5 hrs/week to test scalability

Twitter: CUT TO MINIMUM

  • Terrible ROI (-95.1%) with high time cost
  • 0.30 signups/hr is 70% worse than LinkedIn
  • Reduce to 30 min/week scheduled posts
  • Re-evaluate in 30 days with UTM data

Overall: DIVERSIFY AWAY FROM SOCIAL

  • Both platforms are severely ROI-negative
  • Save 16 hours/month ($1,200) and test higher-ROI channels
  • Email + SEO likely to outperform by 3-5x per hour

The bottom line: You’re spending 28 hours/month ($2,100) to generate 14 signups worth $171.50/month. That’s a 91.8% loss. Unless social media provides massive indirect value you’re not tracking, you should dramatically reduce time investment and shift to channels with better unit economics.