Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Small Budget Lead Generation Optimization
Analyzes 3 months of data (minimum threshold) for a small $6.5K/month budget across SEO, PPC, and email marketing using lead-based metrics. Identifies email as severely underfunded ($500/mo generating leads at $63 CPL - 56% better than average) while PPC is overfunded ($4K/mo at $182 CPL). Demonstrates proper handling of limited data by adjusting confidence levels (60-70% vs typical 75-85%) and providing conservative recommendations. Shows operational guidance on what to do with reallocated budget (hiring email marketer, content creation). Includes rollback triggers and risk mitigation specific to small budgets.
Input
What you provide to the skill
Small budget: 3 months data, SEO $2k/mo 15 leads, PPC $4k/mo 22 leads, email $500/mo 8 leads. Total budget $6.5k/mo. Want recommendations.
Output
What the skill generates for you
Budget Allocation Analysis & Recommendations
Data Quality Assessment
Quality tier: Acceptable (3 months - minimum threshold)
Confidence level: Moderate (60-70%)
Note: 3 months is minimum. Recommendations would be stronger with 6+ months data.
Current Performance Summary
| Channel | Monthly Spend | Avg Leads | Cost Per Lead | Efficiency Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $500 | 8 | $63 | #1 (Excellent) | |
| SEO | $2,000 | 15 | $133 | #2 (Good) |
| PPC | $4,000 | 22 | $182 | #3 (Poor) |
| TOTAL | $6,500 | 45 | $144 | - |
Critical Finding: Email ($63 CPL) is 3.9x more efficient than PPC ($182) yet receives only 8% of budget while PPC gets 62%. Textbook case for reallocation.
Recommended Reallocation - Conservative Scenario
| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| $500 | $1,500 | +$1,000 (200%) | |
| SEO | $2,000 | $2,500 | +$500 (25%) |
| PPC | $4,000 | $2,500 | -$1,500 (38%) |
| TOTAL | $6,500 | $6,500 | $0 |
Expected Impact:
- Projected leads: 60-68/month (+15-23 leads, +33-51% increase)
- Projected blended CPL: $95-$108 (-$36-49, -25-34% improvement)
- Confidence: Moderate (60-70%)
- Timeline: 45-90 days
What to Do With Reallocated Budget
Email (+$1,000):
- Hire part-time email marketer ($400-600/mo)
- Upgrade automation platform ($100-200/mo)
- List growth tactics ($200-300/mo)
- Expected: 20-24 leads/month maintaining $70-85 CPL
SEO (+$500):
- Content production: 2-3 articles/month ($300-400)
- Technical SEO improvements ($100-200)
- Expected: 18-20 leads/month
PPC (-$1,500):
- Cut bottom 30-40% of keywords
- Tighten targeting, improve Quality Score
- Focus on high-conversion times only
- Expected: Maintain 18-20 leads at $125-140 CPL
Implementation Timeline
- Weeks 1-2: Hire email resource, audit PPC campaigns
- Weeks 3-4: Reduce PPC to $3K, increase email to $1K
- Month 2: Complete transition, launch automated sequences
- Month 3: Evaluate results vs projections
Limitations: Does not account for lead quality differences (PPC may bring higher-intent leads), email list size constraints, or SEO content lag time.
About This Skill
Analyze historical marketing channel performance and get actionable budget reallocation recommendations to maximize ROI.
View Skill DetailsMore Examples
B2B SaaS Multi-Channel CAC Optimization
Analyzes 6 months of performance across Google Ads ($180 CAC), Facebook ($290 CAC), and LinkedIn ($520 CAC) for a B2B SaaS company. Demonstrates clear efficiency ranking, identifies LinkedIn as severe underperformer (2.9x more expensive than Google), and recommends reallocating $7K-$11K to Google Ads. Shows how to improve total conversions by 12-29% while reducing blended CAC by 12-25%. Includes conservative and aggressive scenarios with confidence-adjusted projections.
E-commerce ROAS-Based Channel Reallocation
Evaluates 5 months of e-commerce marketing data using ROAS metrics: Facebook 3.2x, Google Shopping 5.8x, TikTok 1.9x. Identifies Google Shopping as severely underfunded (33% of budget despite 5.8x ROAS) and TikTok as underperformer (1.9x ROAS consuming 22% of budget). Recommends shifting $10K-$18K to Google Shopping from TikTok and Facebook. Projects 24-47% revenue increase and blended ROAS improvement from 3.78x to 4.65x-5.20x. Demonstrates handling of ROAS metrics vs CAC and provides detailed scaling guidance for each channel.