All examples for Attribution Model Comparison & Selector

Local Dental Practice with Phone Conversions

Attribution analysis for a local dental practice with 50 new patients, mixed online/offline channels, and phone as primary conversion mechanism. Demonstrates handling the 'phone gets all credit' problem and reveals hidden value in direct mail.

Input

What you provide to the skill

Local dental practice - 50 new patients, mix of Google Ads, Facebook, direct mail, referrals. Most call to book. 1-7 day cycle.

Output

What the skill generates for you

Attribution Model Comparison Results

Credit Distribution by Model

Last-Touch Attribution:

  • Phone Call: 72%
  • Google Ads: 12%
  • Facebook Ads: 8%
  • Direct Mail: 4%
  • Referrals: 4%

Position-Based (Marketing Channels Only):

  • Google Ads: 33%
  • Organic/Maps: 24%
  • Facebook Ads: 16%
  • Direct Mail: 15%
  • Referrals: 12%

Linear (Marketing Channels Only):

  • Google Ads: 30%
  • Organic/Maps: 26%
  • Facebook Ads: 18%
  • Direct Mail: 14%
  • Referrals: 12%

Time-Decay (Marketing Channels Only):

  • Google Ads: 36%
  • Organic/Maps: 22%
  • Facebook Ads: 17%
  • Direct Mail: 12%
  • Referrals: 13%

First-Touch:

  • Google Ads: 40%
  • Organic/Maps: 24%
  • Facebook Ads: 16%
  • Direct Mail: 12%
  • Referrals: 8%

The Problem with Last-Touch

Last-touch is broken for call-driven service businesses:

  • “Phone Call” gets 72% credit
  • Phone is a conversion mechanism, not a marketing channel
  • No visibility into what drove the call

Key Insights

Direct Mail: Invisible to Non-Existent

  • Currently getting 0% visibility in basic tracking
  • Actually drives 12-15% of patient value
  • Works as top-of-funnel driver leading to brand search

Google Ads vs. Organic:

  • Google Ads: Appears as 40% (last-touch) but really 33-36% (multi-touch)
  • Organic/Maps: Hidden in last-touch, but drives 22-24% of value

Recommendation: Position-Based Attribution

Why this fits:

  1. Short sales cycle (1-7 days) but multi-touch journeys (60% have 2+ touchpoints)
  2. Clear stages: awareness (direct mail, ads) → consideration (website, maps) → conversion (phone)
  3. Values both discovery AND conversion actions
  4. Most common for local service businesses

Why NOT Time-Decay:
While the cycle is short, the 1-7 day window doesn’t meaningfully differentiate touchpoint value by time. Position-based better reflects the awareness/conversion split.

Why NOT Linear:
Not all touchpoints are equal—initial discovery and final conversion moments matter more than middle touches.

Implementation Requirements

To track attribution accurately:

  1. Call tracking numbers per channel

    • Unique number for Google Ads
    • Unique number for Facebook Ads
    • Unique number for Direct Mail pieces
    • Track forwarding to main line
  2. UTM parameters on all digital

    • Website links from Facebook Ads
    • Google Ads destination URLs
    • Track in Google Analytics
  3. Updated intake form

    • Change from “How did you hear about us?”
    • To “How did you FIRST hear about us?”
    • Add second question: “What made you call today?”
  4. CRM integration

    • Log all touchpoints before phone call
    • Track days from first touch to conversion

Budget Reallocation Impact

Current Budget: $3,000/month

Current Allocation (Based on Last-Touch Bias):

  • Google Ads: $1,800 (60%)
  • Facebook Ads: $600 (20%)
  • Direct Mail: $300 (10%)
  • SEO/Local: $300 (10%)

Optimized Allocation (Based on Position-Based Attribution):

  • Google Ads: $1,050 (35%) [-$750]
  • Facebook Ads: $480 (16%) [-$120]
  • Direct Mail: $450 (15%) [+$150]
  • SEO/Local: $720 (24%) [+$420]
  • Referral Program: $300 (10%) [+$300 NEW]

Expected Outcomes

Immediate (Month 1-3):

  • More balanced marketing mix
  • Better visibility into true channel performance
  • Reduced over-reliance on paid search

Medium-term (Month 4-6):

  • Stronger organic presence from SEO investment
  • Direct mail-to-search journeys increase
  • Referral program generates predictable patient flow

Long-term (Month 7-12):

  • Lower overall cost per patient (less paid ad dependency)
  • More defensible patient acquisition (own your organic presence)
  • Compounding returns from referrals and SEO

Validation Framework

Test if position-based attribution predicts future performance:

  1. Month 1: Implement tracking and measure baseline
  2. Month 2-3: Shift 20% of budget based on position-based model
  3. Month 4: Compare:
    • Did channels predicted to perform better actually deliver?
    • Did cost per patient decrease?
    • Did patient quality remain consistent?
  4. Month 5+: Full reallocation if validation successful

Quick Wins

This Week:

  • Set up call tracking for Google Ads and Direct Mail
  • Update website intake form question
  • Add UTM parameters to Facebook Ads

This Month:

  • Launch small referral incentive ($50 credit for both parties)
  • Increase SEO budget by $200 (content, local listings)
  • Test Direct Mail to different neighborhood

This Quarter:

  • Build full attribution dashboard
  • Optimize based on 90 days of clean data
  • Create patient journey documentation

Model Selection Rationale Summary

Model Fit for Your Business Reason
Last-Touch ❌ Poor Over-credits phone calls (not a channel)
First-Touch ⚠️ Partial Shows awareness, ignores conversion journey
Linear ✓ Acceptable Simple, fair, but doesn’t reflect importance hierarchy
Time-Decay ✓ Good Short cycle fits, but days don’t meaningfully differ
Position-Based ✓✓ Best Values awareness AND conversion, fits 2-3 touch journeys

Bottom Line: Position-based attribution will reveal that you’re over-investing in Google Ads (last-touch bias) and under-investing in the channels that create awareness (direct mail, SEO, referrals). The 1-7 day cycle with 2-3 average touchpoints is the perfect fit for this model.